None explication?!!!!!
2007-02-04 17:47:03 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because John Kerry is unelectible in a presidential race. He's dull and he's a dolt.
2007-02-04 17:50:12 · answer #1 · answered by Mickey Mouse Spears 7 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Blame the Democrats! Bush was elected by default. If the Democrats ran a serious candidate like Senators Byron Dorgan or Kent Conrad, both of North Dakota, or Tom Vilsack of Iowa they would have been much more competitive. Weep all you want about Gore in 2000, but it was his election to lose. He should have at least carried his home state and the state of his predecessor. I agree that Bush sounds ridiculous whenever he opens his mouth, but Kerry sounded even more ridiculous.
Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans have run their best talent in years. As a result, most elections are about voting AGAINST the other candidate. Both of Clinton's pluralities were victories by default. Bush 41 vs. Dukakis was a joke. Neither of Reagan's challengers were very serious. Carter should have beat Ford, stained by the Nixon taint, by more than he did. And on and on.
Now the Democrats are considering Hillary (note that none of her campaign literature ever uses her last name - Rodham or Clinton). The Republicans could run just about anyone against her in the general election and win. Outside of a few circles, no one likes her. As an alternative to Hillary, Barak Obama may run. He would be torn apart, having only two years of legislative experience.
2007-02-05 02:25:24 · answer #2 · answered by Jesus Jones 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
John I married in Katchup money Kerry is a lair and coward...oh my lord he served in Nam and wont release all his medical records..and the Swift boat vets hate him..Bush is better than Kerry..hell my cats are better then Kerry..and I live in Mass..these people here are nuts and dim wits..Bring on Jeb Bush...let the family business keep going..
2007-02-05 10:51:59 · answer #3 · answered by Kingofreportedabuse 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because those who voted for him fell for the dirty commercialized lies. Because the Bush-kissing media honkers are clever at manipulating lies, or are just incompetent or lazy loud-mouthed trumpets who use their mouths, not brains, failing to research into facts and evidence and misled the voters into voting for the Chimp. There are, of course, voters who believed that the Chimp was really hearing God's voice!
My only hope is that, come 2008, the voters who now understand that they were fooled in 2004, stop listening to those who had fooled them!
2007-02-05 02:04:59 · answer #4 · answered by United_Peace 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
because the losing party doesn't give a damn about this country. they only care about "how to get elected in '08". And with the Internet and other "alternative" news outlets they can't just lie to us like the old days.
Think about it. Do they have a plan besides surrender in Iraq.
Can they honestly do what they propose without raising taxes. Will they continue the march against G_D, in regards to late term abortions, protecting child predators, or destroying G_D's covenant of Marriage? I don't think so.
At least half of the voters in this country see through the lies, and refuse to drink of their Kool-Aid. All they have is the childish act of Calling people names or reacting with rudeness and violence to people who disagree with their Socialist goals.
2007-02-05 01:58:29 · answer #5 · answered by impalersca 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
because the democrats continue to nominate liberal extremists that cannot win the south.
i would have voted democratic last election if there had been any other option but kerry - and i was a republican at the time.
i just didn't vote because i thought neither were worth it.
2007-02-05 02:22:48 · answer #6 · answered by j_mang 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Thank you . He is criticized by the anti-American liberal democrats in office because they fear we the people are on to them and their communist ambition . People are rather fond of democracy . Liberal Democrats speak out against democracy at every turn . One of the funnier propaganda points the democrats use is their constant slam that Republicans are for the rich .John Kerry ; Ted Kennedy & Bill & Hillary are all quite rich ; and Bill Clinton is getting paid MILLIONS from foreign communist governments while Hillary campaigns for the white House - and half of Bill's $$ is Hillary Clinton's ..Watch her wave her hand to flick away that question when it comes up during the campaign .
2007-02-05 02:10:00 · answer #7 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Part of it was the smear campaign run against Kerry. Part of it was voting irregularities in Ohio. Part of it was sheer luck -- he got the electoral votes, and just over half of the popular vote. Keep in mind, poor Clinton was horribly criticized, and he was re-elected by a far greater margin than was Bush. Having just under half the country voting against you can lead to a *lot* of criticism.
2007-02-05 01:51:23 · answer #8 · answered by Vaughn 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
You were fooled, it was rigged! Everybody knows it. Check out the Truth stories out there & decide for yourself. It doesn't matter who you vote for, they are all after one agenda.
2007-02-05 01:57:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The theft of Ohio and its electoral votes has been proven.
Now let's hear the Repubs whine.
2007-02-05 01:57:34 · answer #10 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Take the criticism from its source.
For instance, if Bush lied - where's the proof?
If Bush has committed any crimes - what are they?
I Bush "stole" the election - why hasn't he been impeached?
You get the picture - the criticism, in general, is just plain, old fashioned, unfounded rhetoric from his opponents.
2007-02-05 01:56:48 · answer #11 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋