Nazi-Cons and Nazi-Libs are both spoiled snobs who have taken over our democracy. Bickering among themselves as if only their sheltered and ignorant opinions mattered, they snow self-hating people with their over-confident bossiness to trick inferiority-complexed sheep who weren't born rich like they were. Gullible Americans are mind-controlled into believing that whoever's opinions are published, broadcast, or taught must define the rational political spectrum. We have the best ideologies Daddy's Money can buy; politics is a food fight at a prep school.
Common sense and the opinions of the common people have no authority to the pathetic losers who think that quoting some designated mouthpiece of the Nazi-Cons or Nazi-Libs makes them winners, just like a fat, weak, couch-potato sports fan feels like a winner when "his" team wins. In the former United States, self-identity has become a spectator sport.
2007-02-04 18:16:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The only difference between the two parties is the base that they cater to.
The republicans cater to the religious right calling for their signature gay and abortion bans.
The democrats cater to middle and lower middle class with domestic issues and programs.
Both have mortgaged their votes to their party, special interests, and corporations to finance their campaigns, before they are ever sworn into office.
Neither is willing to take a stand to immediately end corrupt practices.
Both use distraction to avert attention from the fact that the laws they pass seldom benefit the American public, due to the huge corporate offsets and protections written into the bills.
Neither want US laws to be clear and concise, enabling the use of loopholes, signing statements and other methods of circumvention.
Neither party has the cajones to confront the serious problem of the centralization of presidential power, legally and illegally, by the current administration.
Both parties are calling for the increase in size of the military to allow us to better invade and occupy the next country that we decide, in the complete absence of evidence, constitutes a threat to our national security.
Neither party fulfilled their Oath of Office to protect and defend the Constitution when they passed the Patriot Act, Homeland Security Act, or Military Commissions Act.
Both parties use personal attacks rather than policies or issues to persuade voters.
Every candidate that voted for the war in Iraq and or the Patriot, Homeland Security, and especially the Military Commissions Act, should be voted out of office.
As long as the same people are running the government, we will stay the course.
We will stay the course in the wars (Terror, Iraq, Drugs).
We will stay the course in political corruption (too many to list from both parties).
We will stay the course in spending ourselves into bankruptcy to protect our sources of a FINITE resource, ensuring someone else will develop a breakthrough technology.
We will stay the course in the dismissal and dismantling of the Constitution and all of It's protections.
We will stay the course in the corporate control of information in our society, ensuring that even blatantly false information will eventually be accepted as fact by a percentage of the population.
We will stay the course in the dismissal of any scientific or intelligence data that does not fit the administrations policies or desires.
We will stay the course in our complete loss of privacy to our government or it's appointed representatives by the centralization and compilation of all civilian and governmental databases.
We will stay the course in the corporate rape of America for profit.
2007-02-05 02:26:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jack C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pelosi is a narcissistic egomaniac that is already creating problems within the Democratic party. Hillary was on the Board of Directors for Wal-Mart for years till Billy was elected. You know that evil company taking over small town America stealing Main St. business customers, lowering wages and hurting the Unions. All the things the Dems hate. Till it is campaign funding time.
2007-02-05 01:56:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by mark g 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I wouldn't worry too much about Nancy Pelosi using Military Transports. The entire world will soon be using them. Do you think that Meggado is at hand?
2007-02-05 01:46:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Samuel Crow 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow. You hit all of Glen Beck's talking points. Try asking your own questions for once. Or you can stay tuned to Glen Beck and get the answers you want to hear.
2007-02-05 01:50:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Speedracer 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
How very right your are.
creecher of the House Nancy Bella Pelosi has put in a request for her own military aircraft. This is a practice that started after 9/11 to allow the top House leader to travel in relative security. It would seem though, that Bella is pressing her new position into a travel agency to cater to her family and staff.
The sources, who include those in Congress and in the administration, said the Democrat is seeking regular military flights not only for herself and her staff, but also for relatives and for other members of the California delegation. A knowledgeable source called the request “carte blanche for an aircraft any time.”
It is one thing for her to say that she is the Screecher and she needs an airplane to take her around especially since a precedent has been set for that. But this idea of having it available any time she wants to fly and to allow her family and staff the same privilege is absolutely criminal. It is not cheap to fly these things and members of our military can not have a plane when ever they want. They must sign up on a space available basis which means if the plane is going there and there is a seat they can get on. It is also worthy to note that our military members do not fly in luxury. Perhaps though, this is why Bella wants a military aircraft to fly her family and friends:
U.S. Air Force travel for VIPs such as members of Congress is first-rate. The planes are staffed with stewards who serve meals and tend an open bar. Communications suites allow members to conduct business while traveling.
Such flights are one of Congress’ cherished perquisites, providing lawmakers a chance to visit foreign lands at government expense. Official duties are often mixed with sightseeing and fine dining.
This is absolutely criminal and needs to stop. We have bloggers worrying about Ney getting his pension of 29 grand a year and the screecher is going to waste who knows how much in tax dollars flying in style. In case someone did not tell her SHE IS NOT THE PRESIDENT. I think it is criminal that these pious jackasses (and I mean all of them) are treated like royalty on military aircraft when our troops sit in cargo net seats, drink water and eat MREs. [As an aside, Ney earned the pension, unlike the ILLEGALS who can be paid Social Security. Bill Clinton still gets his pension and he was guilty of a crime.]
Bella Pelosi is no one special and the President had better consider this request very carefully. If she deserves a plane based upon 9/11 precedent then fine, but there had better be some tight constraints like no family, limited staff and NO FIRST CLASS BS. Here is a woman who opposes us winning the war, who opposes sending more troops, who opposes any more money for the effort but wants to waste money having the military fly her and her family around like she is the Queen of the country. Absolutely not!
I guess it is obvious that the culture of corruption runs across the aisles, as I have said many times. First she exempts a constituent company from the minimum wage and now she wants to abuse her power and make the military her personal taxi service. It is even more obvious that the jackasses who serve in Congress think they are more important than they really are and they consider themselves the elitist class here to lead we peons around. I also assume this will lay to rest any talk about Pelosi NOT being a San Francisco Liberal elitist. She has demonstrated that she is way out of the mainstream and she definitely considers herself to be among the elite.
Shame on you Bella Pelosi, you overblown windbag. You should have stayed home keeping house because you certainly do not belong in Congress. If I had a say they would send you in a cargo plane with a parachute. If that method of leaving the plane is good enough for the troops, it is good enough for you.
2007-02-05 01:53:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by m c 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
The Bush admin and MANY republicans are convicted or under investigation for crimes. Way more than the current Dem party or ANY party in US history.
It's like your yelling at a person with parking tickets while Bush murders someone and runs RIGHT past you with a bloody butcher knife.
...and your all bent out of shape about this person with the parking tickets.
so sad.
2007-02-05 01:53:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Justin 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
After seeing some of the Q&A's on this site, she probably
fears for her & her familys life.
2007-02-05 01:48:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Calee 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
casue its still a big money game to win elections
and if dems dont they stand to lose
2007-02-05 01:46:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by WMD LIEr W 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
perks. goes with the job.
2007-02-05 01:52:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋