I sure do.
2007-02-04 16:59:34 · 9 answers · asked by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I also agree. As much as I think it would be great to finally have a woman president, let's face it, Hillary is part of what's pulling the Democrats to the right. Look at their respective records. Nader knows what most people ignore which is that even if he can't win, his running can help push issues & solutions and encourage people to think and bring pressure on other candidates to address certain issues. The further right the Democratic candidate, the more important it is for Nader to run in order to try to bring public attention to issues and to Hillary's record and so, try to pull the Democratic party back into standing for American people's interests.
2007-02-06 10:21:21 · answer #1 · answered by at313 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nader is more irrelevant than Ross Perot was.
In the last election, Nader couldn't get on the ballet in some states because he had to forge signatures to make it over the threshold.
2007-02-05 01:02:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
There are no circumstances under which it could possibly be important for Nader to run.
2007-02-05 01:44:21 · answer #3 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Now is a good time for Ralph to run. He may win as independent as most people are sick of both the dems and the repubs now.
GO RALPHY BOY!
2007-02-05 01:03:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Haha! Yes, because then it will be a battle of red vs green.
2007-02-05 01:02:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He would serve to steal votes from Hilary... and that would be fine with me. I don't like Nader or Hilary.
2007-02-05 01:21:09 · answer #6 · answered by scruffycat 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I'd vote for him
2007-02-05 01:10:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
he would have a better chance
2007-02-05 01:03:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
not a bit.
2007-02-05 02:09:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋