http://www.house.gov/chabot/images/pbasign2.jpg
Here's a hint: the legislation being singed has to do with a ban on "Partial Birth" abortions and doesn't include a consideration for the health of the mother.
2007-02-04 16:45:40 · 10 answers · asked by I'll Take That One! 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Thanksgiving is over, pilgrim. Please remove that ridiculous hat.
FYI - Hey, Calee. Why do women sit and wait for someone else to revolt before they join in? If you don't like it, get off your keester and do something about it. Otherwise, stop COMPLAINING about OTHER WOMEN!! You are NO DIFFERENT.
2007-02-04 16:48:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
1) You do not need a health consideration for the mother. If the doctor has to chose between loosing the mother or loosing the child. he always has had that right. It is common medical practices.
2) There is not one case on record where a partial birth abortion was done to save the mothers life.
2007-02-05 00:59:36 · answer #2 · answered by ALunaticFriend 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Yes, I must say, the mothers health should most definately be taken into consideration as well as the health of the child, I personally feel that it is better to abort than to force a child to live with a permenant severe disability.
2007-02-05 00:53:20 · answer #3 · answered by Girly Q 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Well, consider the fact that 100 percent of abortions don't include a consideration for the health of a child.
2007-02-05 00:51:12 · answer #4 · answered by chris 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Not one woman among them. Disturbing as usual from
this administration.
I really don't understand why women will allow men to make
laws for them without their consideration - what has happened
to women?!!
When they finally get a grip to speak up for themselves,
I will be more than glad to join the revolt.
And yes, I have signed & sent petitions to Senator Murphy &
Senator Spector, miss elle666.
2007-02-05 00:50:10 · answer #5 · answered by Calee 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
In my personal opinion, I see pregnancy is my health issue. I have to make my own decision about it. I have no idea why my health has something to do with the masses in this country who want to tell me about Pro choice and Pro life.
2007-02-05 01:01:07 · answer #6 · answered by ryladie99 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Until the supposed "pro-life" faction starts putting at least the LIFE of the mother first -- I'd prefer they also consider her autonomy over her own body, but at minimum consider her life -- I can have little respect for them and their so-called "pro-life" ways. That's what's wrong with the picture.
2007-02-05 00:54:11 · answer #7 · answered by Vaughn 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
You obviously have no idea about how this procedure is done.There are absolutely no circumstances in which the life of the mother would be saved by opening up the back of the skull of a child and sucking it's brains out.
2007-02-05 00:50:12 · answer #8 · answered by Jace 4 · 3⤊ 4⤋
well, if GW really want's to singe that bill, he'd be better off using a lighter or a match than a pen.
i'd suggest a nuculer weapon to do the job...
2007-02-05 00:51:31 · answer #9 · answered by josef 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
looks OK to me.
2007-02-05 02:20:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋