English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

grizzles or celtics, celtics 14 game loseing streak

2007-02-04 16:43:02 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Basketball

17 answers

BOSTON

2007-02-04 16:45:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Grizzlies are less talented, even with Gasol back they are still lousy. Relying on guys like Chucky Atkins in any respect is never a good sign. Playing time for Rudy Gay & Hakim Warrick has been kind of puzzling, so their future prospects aren't good either. Plus I have no clue about the Grizzlies' coach. It just sounds like he is just Jerry West & Co's puppet.

So despite their current woes, I'll say that the Celtics are better. The injury bug has bit hard and often in Boston. Paul Pierce, Wally Szczerbiak, and Tony Allen I'd have to say were the most notable. There was a recent Yahoo! Sports article that ripped apart Danny Ainge as a GM, that basically stated that he's cycling in youth who are indifferent to winning or losing. I think it's too early to say Ainge's decisions were a complete failure. I think that Boston fans do not value the virtue of patience, so Ainge's undertaking is not short-term friendly. But, I mean you got to like Al Jefferson's improvement this season. Tony Allen was great too before he got injured (in a manner indicative of the Celt's season). Gerald Green and Rajan Rondo have promise too. So, once they get at least Pierce and Szczerbs back at 100%, they should win a little more frequently. When that will happen, I can not say. Also, Doc Rivers is an ok coach, or at least a coach I've actually heard of.

2007-02-05 15:35:52 · answer #2 · answered by mrgetdownsyndrome 3 · 0 0

It's hard to pick between Boston and Memphis because they both got hit so hard with injuries, most notably Pierce and Gasol. I have to go with Memphis though since they've still done poorly even with Gasol healthy. It looks like losing so many games at the beginning of the season completely crushed the rest of the teams' spirits. A summer off, maybe a couple of comfortable trades (NOT Gasol) might just get them back to a competitive level. I tell you now, unless the grizz get Chicago's three best players and a draft pick Pau Gasol is going nowhere.

2007-02-04 17:36:04 · answer #3 · answered by tdubya86 3 · 0 0

Celtics..My Grizzlies do suck this year, but they really aren't as bad as they seem. Many of their losses have been relativly close. They just seem to get down early, but usually rally late, but just fall a little short. Especially in light of the coaching and front office problems this year, and the fact that Gasol is just now starting to regain his form from the preseason broken leg..Of course he's probably about to go bye-bye. Swift has been out with injuries, Lowry is out. Cardinal and Roberts were also injured at one point.

Although I really haven't been watching the Celtics closely this year.(There's been no reason too)

2007-02-04 16:50:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

By far, I'd have to say Boston. Telfair and Pierce are probably the ONLY two pieces in Boston's sad little puzzle worth anything right now. And Sebastian Telfair is sooo not being played to his strengths, which is a waste. I'd almost be inclined to think that Danny Ainge is deliberately sabotaging the team to put them in a good lottery position.
So, yeah... Boston over Memphis FTL

2007-02-04 16:51:19 · answer #5 · answered by kappaalphapsi 2 · 0 0

Celts, until the Griz deal Gasol. Then they may just pass em.

But, the Knicks get honorable mention for having a ridiculous payroll and not going anywhere, Thomas is not a good contract negotiator. At least Boston's players are on the low end of the payroll.

2007-02-04 16:50:24 · answer #6 · answered by last_texans_fan 2 · 0 0

I'm going also with Bobcants.

Tough to say Memphis - injuries have held them down and now they're just playing out the season.

Boston sucks but should be better and are much better without the injuries.

Hawks suck turd, but again, injuries.

Bobcats have had injuries. They have great players. They have the worst coach. They have the most overrrated rookie ever in Morrisson.

Screw the bobcants, I hate that team.

2007-02-04 18:29:25 · answer #7 · answered by sparkloom 3 · 1 0

It's the Grizzlies. If Tony Allen, Paul Pierce and Wally Szczerbiak didn't miss most of the season the records wouldn't even be close.

For more on the Celtics, Grizzlies and the NBA, check this site out. http://factipedia.com/sportsblogs/nba.html

2007-02-04 16:47:53 · answer #8 · answered by Josefina Q 2 · 0 0

If you base it on the standings, it would be the C's but if you look at it man-to-man I'd say its the Grizz. What the records says is what my opinion is...Celtics are the worst team

2007-02-04 20:32:42 · answer #9 · answered by Daryl K 2 · 0 0

as a lot as i opt to say constructive, it merely does now no longer ensue. The sheer length adjustments from college to the nba on my own may be too plenty for any college crew. you could favor to undergo in ideas even notwithstanding the nets should be the worst crew in history they're notwithstanding all professionals. what determination sport enthusiasts on any given college crew may bypass to the nba ideal now and commence? i'd anticipate Brooks Lopez with 40 factors and 30 rebounds.

2016-11-02 08:52:40 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Ohh..Charlote Bobcats

2007-02-04 16:50:08 · answer #11 · answered by budz 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers