If the israeli nation can accept to be moved to a far area(congo in africa-for example) with all their necessaries,giving no excuse to arabs around to set any boiling spots in their area,will that cool the middle east long standing problems?!,is not a peace of mind for all !!?
2007-02-04 16:23:23 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Would you move from YOUR country under the same circumstances? I wouldn't.
And given that the US is located in a "far area", and yet the US is targeted for violence by Arabs, I don't think the Arabs show any signs of letting that work anyway.
By the way, why didn't you also suggest the same solution for the Palestinians?
2007-02-04 16:53:24 · answer #1 · answered by freebird 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well, the presence of Israel has cause Arabs / muslims some degree of unifications. They all turn against Israeli.
If Israel relocated, I suspected, the Arabic will become more fractional. Peace they endure will not be that long.
Take a snapshots at the Lebanon, Palestine and Iraq. They are fighting internally. There are some fractional disputes resulting in violences. I doubt it is something that are recent and will go away easily.
But let's put it this way, whatever we hear about the middle east conflicts, Israel is a big part of it. It is a big reason why the Arabs are turning against US. US is a backer of Israel.
2007-02-05 00:48:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would NOT solve anything at all because the problem is not the location of Israel, the problem is that the Arabs want to kill all the Jews.
If the Arabs stopped killing tomorrow there would be peace but if the Israelis put down their weapons tomorrow there would still be no peace because the Arabs would continue to kill Jews in Israel.
Eliminate the Arabs and you have peace as far as you can see.
2007-02-05 00:55:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think something like that could be arranged. All of the Middle East Countries could offer money to an honest broker to buy Israel and then Israel could with the assistance of the United States purchase some other land in another other Country welling to sell it to them.
I myself was thinking that maybe a large area state in America with a low population numbers might go for the idea of selling some of its land to the Israelis which could be used to create a new state, like North Carolina was split off from South Carolina before the Civil War, or right after it..
Good suggestion!! At least something to think about.
2007-02-05 00:35:52 · answer #4 · answered by zclifton2 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No. Israel is only a small issue in that part of the world, and there seem to be problems all over the middle east. I'm pretty sure the Iraqis that are blowing up other Iraqis in schools and marketplaces are not making a statement about Israel.
2007-02-05 00:33:32 · answer #5 · answered by wildraft1 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Possibly, but the Israelis would never accept that. The whole purpose for being there is the Holy Land.
However, even if this did occur, eventually similar problems would begin to emerge. As the world population grows, and as Global Warming alters climate patterns, It will become harder and harder to find food and water to support large populations. While this will affect the whole world, It would probably become more violent between the people with long standing hatred for one another.
Dunno, just my $0.02
2007-02-05 00:31:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would say it would definitely be a large move towards peace. It would not solve all problems.
On the other side, what if all of the arab countries with their billions and billions in oil money and millions of acres of land, took the palestinians in and gave them some land? WOuld that create peace as well?
2007-02-05 00:27:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The problem is God put them there. And what God puts in there, no man can remove.
The question should be why can't everyone get along? The answer is it's what is inside man that will not allow him to seek peace with his brother.
Cain killed Abel.
2007-02-08 22:49:26 · answer #8 · answered by Uncle Remus 54 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The problem with your theory is the idea that Isreal would agree to move.
Won't happen.
The Israeli people believe that that land they occupy was given to them by God.
2007-02-05 01:12:11 · answer #9 · answered by Voodoid 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course you are assuming there is a nation willing to have another nation transplanted into it. This will of course create new and different problems.
2007-02-05 00:30:13 · answer #10 · answered by slinda 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋