...our national interest, why would Hillary start attacking them first? Is her message really to the ignorants and proletariet?
2007-02-04 15:20:24 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The Democratic philosophy is that Big Government is good.
The Republican philosophy is that less government is good; let the business and free enterprise support the country.
Hillary would tend to support vast social programs by high taxes to business and people. Social security is an example of that.
SHe is not a friend of ANY business.
2007-02-04 15:30:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Her "attack" was token at best. The amount of funds affected is a small percentage of the total government perks for the big oil corporations.
It is more of a tactic to show the she and the other democrats are not "pro-oil" like Bush & Co. A more accurate description might be not as obviously "pro-oil".
All Democrats and Republican administrations have had very similar foreign policies, and most, if not all, have used the CIA and covert missions, in addition to overt military actions, to enforce US Corporate desires in countries around the world.
Most of the recent push has been for oil corporations, but we have used our military/covert assets to secure other resources in the world for other corporations.
I am not sure when our parties both decided that US corporate interests should define US foreign policy, but it was a serious mistake. Corporate interests and consumer/employee (ie US Citizen) interests are directly at odds much of the time.
2007-02-04 15:53:11 · answer #2 · answered by Jack C 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ive been on the attack for years. I cant wait till we run out of oil and finally have peace and mind again.
The economy was tanking at $3 a gallon, what if it goes higher, like to $4 and it will.
www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net
Im able to survive off the land , i have all i need, seeds, good earth, good water, which i can pump manually, low diet, low stress, i dont need china , i dont need walmart, i dont need exxon or any other damn greedy corporation.
People had better start worrying about surviving not about who is running for president, hell they cant do anything to help us. It beyond that now!!
2007-02-04 15:35:34 · answer #3 · answered by gipster1966 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oil companies are not our friend buddy. They are our biggest enemy. They are terrible for our world. We have better and less expensive ways to get oil, butthose ways are ignored by our dear ones in government offices. For isntance are you aware of hemp oil? Way better for the environment, and could be less expensive, but at the moment it would not seem that way because tere are very few people willing to back it.
2007-02-04 15:46:22 · answer #4 · answered by imasking 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Her message is populist bilge that she thinks will get her votes. She will say & do anything to anyone to get what she wants. Let's hope that a majority of voters are smart enough to see through her. It won't be aesy with the mainstream media in her pocket.
2007-02-04 16:40:33 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The proletariet? The proletariet??? Dude, Marxism is long dead. Where have you been?
BTW - It's "proletariat".
2007-02-04 15:30:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
How much is Exxon-Mobil paying you tonight?
2007-02-04 15:23:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
He intentions are obvious...
2007-02-04 15:31:47 · answer #8 · answered by no one here gets out alive 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋