Actually, from everything I've seen as evidence (and there's a lot of it) my true belief is that the new leaseholder on the WTC was the one who did it, along with Gulianni. All the evidence is pointing in their direction, for starters.
The leaseholder, upon purchase of all the buildings had paid $15 million. When he took out the insurance policies, the insurance papers showed that he was very specific and had the company add 'destruction by acts of terrorism' on to the policies.
The city of NY had made it perfectly clear at one point, that the buildings were getting to be a thorn in the side because they were beginning to run down and need too much maintenance done.
After the smoke cleared, it's on record that the lease-holder received a settlement of $ 900 Million. Also, this guy had demolition experts bring down the other building that wasn't hit by a plane. I saw the taped interview and he said, "yeah, we told them to pull it."...which is an expression used in professional demolition. There is also proof positive that they used Thermate on the other floors and you can see it on a close-up that some news crew had taken. It was literally melting the corner metal columns and there were also on the scene witnesses who in taped interviews said they heard many explosions. The fire departments, after some time, were told to 'get out' and let it go. Really tragic.
So, that's where I would begin.
The weekend before the planes hit, they shut down all the power in the building to put in new cable lines. Now, this cable had nothing to do with the security system, so that rules out Bush's brother. (cause as you are probably aware, he had the security contract for the building). But this cable was the key.
Man...you've got to go onto infowars.com. They have so much video available regarding 9/11, it's unreal. It's worth every penny to purchase these. It's proof positive that it was in inside job.
2007-02-04 14:28:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by chole_24 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
Instead question whether or not a countries leaders have the power to decive the contrymen and women that it is suppose to be governing.
Then ask if a coutry leaders in history have ever decived a nation for political or personal gain before.
Evidence says terrorism but who controls the release of evidence but the goverment???
Too many questions without diffinitive answers.
If you can answer those questions you might not find it so hard to believe.. that the inconcivable or impossble very well may have been plausible and possible.
Its a scary world we live in people. What do you believe?
2007-02-04 14:23:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by The_Schwarz 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
After 911 any president could have come out of this with the help of all individuals and the international! Too undesirable we had a dyslexic person who did not be responsive to the version between Iraq and Iran. He blew the superb probability to unite the international. He could have performed soooo plenty for international peace.
2016-12-13 08:59:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What happened is clearly the fault of the terrorist and no one else's and to suggest otherwise is illogical and just down right wrong! ~i fail to see where you can draw that conclusion, there is absolutely no evidence of that.
Good for you Daniel that is exactly how we should all feel! I can't believe the things 4 of these people have said here tonight, our President is not a mass murderer or a conspirator and to suggest so is wrong not only wrong but crazy!
2007-02-04 16:32:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Stabbing all real Americans in the back in so many ways? you betcha!
Putting bombs in the Towers? that concept is as stupid as dark canvas level 5 Biocontainment labs with string ties to keep the anthrax contained.
If the loose change nonsense is not a Neocon red herring, it might as well be. There is plenty to be concerned about that has no need of weird science to stand on its own.
You can see a liberal web site here
http://www.counterpunch.org/ninelevenconsp11252006.html
That debunks all the crazy physics and unnecessary weirdness
On the other hand the Widows who lost their husbands in the towers, (usually called the "Jersey Girls" )and worked 24/7 for years to get at the facts, and have only the most obvious slant on the situation put together a real video, that gets at the real Questions and calls for a real investigation
Their Video is here:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1016720641536424083&q=Press+For+Truth&hl=en
2007-02-04 14:36:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Freedem 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Bush Jr is not intelligent enough to pull off WTC. Just look at how is handling the war in Iraq. And, if he pulled it off there would be several leaks and people would know fast.
This was also not pulled off by a low budget terrorist cell. And, also they do not have the proper funding to have pulled off WTC. Again that leads to who truely did it.
Our Government again. There would have been several leaks that we did it.
Which leads to September 10, 2001; School of Advanced Military Studies Report
"Mossad Ruthless and Cunning and has ability to attack US Forces"
I believe you all remember that from Washington Times September 10, 2001 Edition on the Front Page.
For we are fighting Israel's war not our war.
2007-02-04 14:20:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Noctiluae 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
No, I watched it. It was horrible. I saw the planes fly into the buildings. I saw people jump out of the buildings on TV. I was in my 8th grade class. All of our eyes were glued onto the screen. I was glad our President waged war on these terrorists. Fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq has weakoned the terrorists considerably, and I am glad Bush had waged these wars.
2007-02-04 14:51:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Daniel 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
There isn't a single piece of evidence to corroborate the official tale of 9-11.
Bush isn't capable of planning anything beyond breakfast, so he was a bystander. But our govt did 9-11.
2007-02-04 14:35:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by bettysdad 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think only brainwashed political hacks can say Bush was involved with the 9-11 attack and maintain a straight face.
2007-02-04 14:21:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by uidittybop 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
Bush while smart and somewhat intelligent is clearly not intelligent enough to pull that off.
It would take much more than just Bush, CIA, probably Mossad and various other powerful individuals in America and the world.
Bush is not stabbing America in the back. He is doing it to their face, laughing about it, then denying it and calling you a terrorist if you say please Mr. President it hurts stop stabbing me.
2007-02-04 14:15:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Perplexed 7
·
1⤊
6⤋