English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Now that the Sheikh has turned his intentions to Arsenal, does it mean that, as well as having an all foreign team, and a foreign Manager, they will now score the hat trick and get a foreign owner?

2007-02-04 12:56:01 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Football English Football

11 answers

So will that make it the Arabs v the Jews in North London ....should be interesting??

2007-02-04 15:35:32 · answer #1 · answered by richiesown 4 · 1 0

I've heard a little whisper that the Sheikh is ready to Shake his money at another North London club that isn't Arsenal........

2007-02-04 19:39:27 · answer #2 · answered by I.P. 3 · 1 0

As the stadium is already sponsored by Emirates Airlines there is an obvious tie up but will Arsenals wealthy owners be willing to sell?

2007-02-04 19:35:04 · answer #3 · answered by Brian J 3 · 1 0

OK hammers, I grew up blowing bubbles, but alas am now surrounded by Arsenal supporters....although always feel gutted how West Ham (cha cha cha) are kinda the underdogs when they should be up there!

But the likes of Thierry (oh hello!) and of course (yum bloody yum) is a world class player!?

As for foreign managers............SVEN for ENGLAND?????

I rest my case!! And thank you ;o}

hehe xXx

2007-02-04 13:31:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I suppose he wants to raise his profile by buying the greatest football team in the world who play exiting classy football & have never been out of the top league in their history.

What a great team

2007-02-04 13:09:13 · answer #5 · answered by ANDREW H 4 · 0 0

hmmmm first time i heard of this!!!
i thought he was going for liverpool??
anyhoo.... i don't think arsenal would go to "foriegn owners" because Arsene Wenger claims that it kills english football...
to be honest, as long as the brother can hook a sister up with some free tickets then i'm all for it!!! :D

2007-02-05 09:40:42 · answer #6 · answered by jt_iz_mine 1 · 0 0

i wouldnt pay £450 for arsenal

2007-02-04 13:03:13 · answer #7 · answered by qwerty 3 · 0 1

450m waste of money

2007-02-04 14:31:27 · answer #8 · answered by wilster 4 · 0 0

better than having an egghead in charge i suppose

2007-02-04 23:30:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Me-thinks you may be slightly deluded.

2007-02-04 13:02:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers