Ok-I was so upset when I heard they picked Jennifer Aniston. She is not a very good actress. They why did they changed so much compared to the book.
Opinions please.
2007-02-04 12:54:40 · 3 answers · asked by ? 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
If you didn't like the move and like to read . The book is so much more better and there is a lot more detail to the movie.
Lucinda is dark haired and more if an unknown origin.
2007-02-04 13:29:18 · update #1
I haven't read the book, and I didn't really care for the movie.
2007-02-04 13:19:35 · answer #1 · answered by catfan 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I read the book and saw the movie, and while I think that the movie stands on its own and is rather underrated, they did change a lot from the book, especially the setting and the ending. I actually thought that Jennifer Aniston was a good choice for the role, although I was surprised to hear that she was playing the role given how Lucinda is described in the book; her performance was more nuanced than the one-note femme fatale that you'd get out of a lot of actresses, and while she's not the first person you think of when you think "dark and mysterious", the change in hair color and the wardrobe did enough, I think.
2007-02-05 09:56:59 · answer #2 · answered by Erin L 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am rarely happy with the adaptation of books to the big screen. The only time I've ever been even slightly happy is with the LOTR series and the Harry Potter movies.
2007-02-04 21:07:45 · answer #3 · answered by Chel 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋