Didn't he do enough to destroy this country in the name of his ego?
2007-02-04 12:07:10 · 18 answers · asked by thequeenreigns 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
As far as I am concerned, he has the same blood on his hands as George W.
There would be a lot of sons and daughters alive today if he didn't nurse his ego and take votes away from Al Gore
2007-02-04 13:53:17 · answer #1 · answered by crossingover 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The Green Party is only a minor component in the political spectrum. Ralph Nader is a good man but has no chance of winning.
2007-02-04 12:44:45 · answer #2 · answered by Kwan Kong 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I support Ralph Nader's decision to run. He's completely right that the Republicans and Democrats are really the same thing. I hope that we manage to get a real 3rd or 4th party developed here in America. It'd be nice to have some real choice and a chance to mix things up.
2007-02-04 12:12:04 · answer #3 · answered by okgogeo 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
It'd be great if Nader ran so he could suck more votes away from Hillary. The man is true national hero for his efforts in keeping the Dems from the Presidency.
2007-02-04 13:22:02 · answer #4 · answered by VoodooPunk 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In some states he can, yet, frankly at this element one wonders if hes in his precise ideas, the merely precise element we favor is for a spoiler candidate, alongside with Nader change into very last outing, to allow the Democratic vote to be split and get stuck with yet another Republican. yet i imagine all notwithstanding the most out-there enthusiasts are attentive to that.
2016-11-02 08:22:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, first of all... I can't see what Nader did in the name of his ego. Certainly nothing like the present egomaniac is doing... but as for your question.. no he will never run again.. his time is past.
2007-02-04 12:21:50 · answer #6 · answered by Debra H 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Republicans
2007-02-04 12:16:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no concern at all. nader and john kerry belong in hollywood it's there best chance.
2007-02-04 13:21:52 · answer #8 · answered by hotrod57 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is Mr. Irrelevant (with apologies to the last player picked in the NFL draft). His time is long past. The only thing he could ruin now is his shirt, by drooling on it.
2007-02-04 12:19:22 · answer #9 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I hope he does, it beats having to write in 'none of the above'. Its really pathetic how the "liberals" blame Nader instead of excepting responsibility for losing. The "two" parties are intertwined, They give you the illusion of choice. They work together pretending to still be seperate parties when really they are working together. They have everything planned how to strip you of all your rights. The gays will vote democratic because sexuality is more important to them than the right to self defense, and gun owners will vote republican because the right to self defense is more important to them than sexuality ect ect ect... Its absolutely pointless to vote for either of the "two" parties when they are really just one single party. Any vote for republicans or democrats is a wasted vote.
2007-02-04 12:27:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋