Some wags would say we already had 8 years of Hillary as president.
In any case, I am with you on that one. Let's give it a pass and find somebody else this time around.
-Dio
2007-02-04 12:02:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by diogenese19348 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
in my opinion it is the reason I supported Gore in the beginning up. yet I additionally supported him using fact he had journey. Obama would not. yet i can comprehend why some are careful of this. It merely merely isn't democratic. yet i felt it would be much less so having yet another Republican, and that i presumed Hillary could greater powerful beat McCain. Thats why I voted for her. yet now obama's the guy, i'm hoping he can win. yet do not ever diss the Clinton family contributors. They gave us the longest financial growth in US historic previous via ending the deficit with no single Republican vote, stored terror assaults off our soil for 8 years regardless of that Al Qaeda have been formenting for years decrease than Reagan/Bush, something Bush could not do for 8 months, they ended welfare as we knew it, diminished crime, and maximum severely made us Dems greater doable lower back. Our electoral vote customary went from 40 9 to 262, from the three elections earlier clinton to the two after Clinton. and that takes into consideration we actually could had greater cuz of Florida 2000.
2016-12-13 08:53:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by scheiber 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary is a hard working, intelligent, politically astute person in her own right. She has carefully thought out ideas and is strong minded. The country did not fare badly under Bill Clinton. He was not a mistake, the Republican Congress was as they are proving now
John Edward is also an excellent candidate. If you are looking for new ideas, look into his candidacy.
2007-02-04 12:18:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by madisonian51 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
Yes a Clinton again--good God someone has to fix this mess Now is the time for a woman to take over.
2007-02-04 16:03:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by GO HILLARY 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
As Glen Beck said,After Hillary will be Jeb then Chelsea~
2007-02-04 13:19:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Classic96 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's the battle of Good and Evil. Bush=Good, Clinton=Evil
2007-02-04 12:35:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think that the current trend towards dynastic presidential politics is a very bad idea. It started with JFK to RFK. RFK was a very shrewd operator, it was not good that he was killed, but I think he would have been a bad president. Same thing can be said about Bush Jr. and most likely Hillery.
2007-02-04 12:06:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Paul K 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
Yes, Bill should have had a son. There are plenty more Bush boys.
2007-02-04 12:02:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
but thank God there are no more Bushes on the horizon...Hillary is someone I would lend my son to go to war for...Bush is all about the big Corporation and profits...if Hillary wanted war, there would be a good reason
2007-02-04 12:15:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ford Prefect 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
For misleading the American people, and launching the most foolish war since Emperor Augustus in 9 B.C sent his legions into Germany and lost them, Bush deserves to be impeached and, once he has been removed from office, put on trial along with the rest of the president's men. If convicted, they'll have plenty of time to mull over their sins.
2007-02-04 12:04:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by dstr 6
·
5⤊
3⤋