English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

GORDON BROWN was accused last night of trying to take Britain into the European single currency by stealth after surprising the City with an announcement that he was selling more than half of the country's gold reserves, leaving Britain the lowest bullion holdings of any major country.

The £4 billion of gold reserves - 415 tonnes - will be converted into euros, dollars and yen over the next few years. The sale will see the proportion of reserves held in gold falling from 17 per cent to 7 per cent. The Chancellor's announcement triggered a fall in the price of gold and provoked Tories and Euro-sceptic businessmen to claim the decision was politically motivated to prepare Britain's entry into the euro.

Their suspicions were fuelled by the timing of the announcement on a Friday afternoon when most MPs were away from Westminster and news coverage was dominated by the outcome of the elections for the Scottish Parliament, Welsh Assembly and English local councils.

The Treasury issued a bland, three-paragraph statement, saying the sale was intended to achieve "better balance" in Britain's reserve portfolio by increasing the percentage held in currency rather than gold but gave no suggestion that the move was linked to preparations for the single currency. Sources in the gold market claimed that Mr Brown had acted against the advice of Eddie George, the governor of the Bank of England, but this was denied.

The City greeted the news with dismay. Haruko Fukuda, chief executive of the World Gold Council, said: "This is a political decision, in preparation for joining the euro. This move appears to be pre-empting the promised referendum. Gold has special characteristics. It has been held as a reserve for thousands of years. Its value does not rely on anybody else's promise to pay, unlike cash, and it builds public confidence."

Francis Maude, the shadow chancellor, said: "Gordon Brown is trying to drag Britain into the single currency by stealth by making it appear inevitable. This could be another step along that road. It is time Gordon Brown started running the British economy in the interests of Britain and not in the interests of Europe."

After the sale, Britain will hold just 300 tonnes of bullion - a minimal amount when compared with other major economies. Around 40 per cent of the gold will be converted into euros; the same amount into dollars and the remaining 20 per cent into yen.

The sale of the reserves was seen at Westminster as a further attempt by the Treasury to bring Britain's economy into line with those states already signed up to the single currency. The Chancellor has made no secret of his desire to get Britain into a position where it can join the single currency early in the next Parliament - probably by 2002 - with the minimum of financial upheaval.

The European Central Bank, which adminsters the euro, has been encouraging those countries in the single currency to sell some of their huge gold reserves. It believes gold is a bad investment. The price peaked at $835 an ounce in 1980, but it has been struggling along at around $300 for the last 10 years. Yesterday, the price dropped sharply from $289.25 an ounce to $282.40 (£178.70).

However, a spokesman for the Treasury said: "This has nothing whatever to do with joining the euro. It is about efficient asset allocation within the foreign exchange reserves." The sale, to start next year, will bring to an end the Bank of England's 300-year-old practice of holding gold as a significant part of Britain's foreign exchange reserves.

A spokesman for the anti-euro group Business for Sterling said: "Since we know it is a political decision and we know that the European Central Bank has said that countries that want to join the euro have to sell off their gold reserves, it looks like another part of the Government's stealth policy."

2007-02-04 11:46:58 · answer #1 · answered by footynutguy 4 · 2 1

It was apparently not about joining the Euro, because we didn't.

Perhaps it was because holding gold reserves became redundant in the 1970's when the Harold Wilson Labour government took the UK off the gold standard by which the currency was valued against the amount of gold bullion reserves held and was measured against the USA dollar.

In short, I don't know the answer but as a complete layman on the subject I don't see what use gold bullion locked away in a vault somewhwere is to anybody.

2007-02-04 11:56:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

You recommend he did not sell the gold? And right here grew to become into I questioning he did sell the gold, after saying that he grew to become into going to accomplish that, driving down the value of gold, so as that he lost funds on the deal interior the time between saying it and advertising it. i don't think of that i might desire to discover anybody who thinks he had bought all the united kingdom Gold Reserves, yet you're able to mixture with people who do. i'm not even a tory, in basic terms a student of actuality an an opponent of revisionist history.

2016-09-28 10:27:29 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Brown followed an economic theory that is gaining ground in America and the UK that says that paper currency is an end in its own and it need no longer be backed by gold reserves so having gold in the bank to maintain confidence in the currency is not necessary because these days no one goes rushing to the bank to convert paper into gold as happened in days gone by.

But unfortunately he is grossly mistaken. There is nothing better than gold reserves. He was told and he stopped selling. He would have sold the lot and we would have been F***ed.

2007-02-04 13:56:49 · answer #4 · answered by K. Marx iii 5 · 1 0

Because you are broke just like the USA all those debts to the Arabs and the foreign banks. Thank Bush and Blaire et al.
Oil Companies????? hmmmm. Bad enough that British sold out the crown jewels to the Pakis but now regretably there is going to be a battle of our good people a major War for the mistake these lousy rotten politicians did to us all over the world and it is out of control now. So matey batten down the hatches and dive dive dive.

2007-02-04 11:47:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

He wanted the money to spend - the fact that was the worst time to sell in 20 years escaped him.

2007-02-05 01:00:30 · answer #6 · answered by LongJohns 7 · 0 0

I have never understood that one and hope you manage to get him to answer for it. You didn't add that he sold at the lowest price for gold for a long time. Perhaps he sold it to a family member

2007-02-08 08:49:18 · answer #7 · answered by Professor 7 · 0 0

the value of gold has also went up massively since then so we got stung something rotten over that.

2007-02-04 14:29:48 · answer #8 · answered by richy 2 · 2 0

To line his & his colleagues pockets.

2007-02-04 12:12:05 · answer #9 · answered by ANDREW H 4 · 1 0

Did he? Ooh! He's a cad isn't he.

2007-02-04 11:43:05 · answer #10 · answered by Jamin 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers