Is beauty an objective part of the universe?

Question

1.) Objective (adj): 1 Detached, impartial; impersonal. 2 Extrinsic; complete in itself.
My photography teacher asked us to think about this question. I wanted to get your input and help with this. Thanks for any of your thoughts. Also- if you have any examples of what it may be.

Answer 1

I don't think beauty is an objective part of the universe because appreciating it and understanding its essence(beauty) requires personal discretion, not as collective clause. Personal influence matters so to say for it can only be perceived individually.

Answer 2

I believe beauty itself is objective. It cares not where it goes, whom it affects or where it happens. It is a complete fluke of nature. But, subjectively, it is definitely all in the eye of the beholder.
As far as examples, again, it is in the eye of the beholder. One person may think a baby's laugh is beautiful. Another might think it is the sun setting over the ocean. Or perhaps one could say it is a gentle breeze blowing through the trees on a warm spring day. It could be the face of your beloved. A symphony, a rap song, or a country ballad.The list is endless.

Answer 3

Not at all. There is no beauty set in stone. A woman considered beautiful today would be considered hideous hundreds of years ago. Soem find life beautiful, others see beauty in death. Some may think a piece of art, whether it is a painting, a poem, a photograph, a play, a dance performance, or anything else expressive, beautiful, whiel the person next to them may scoff at it as cheesey and plain. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, not alwyas the same.

Answer 4

Beauty is definitely an objective part of the universe. That means when we see something and respond with 'That is beautiful', we are correct (or can be, if the thing really is beautiful). In other words, to say something is beautiful is to predicate something about THAT THING. It's not a statement of personal feeling -- the feelings beauty inspires are what prompted the statement, but the beauty itself is objective. Beauty inspires feelings of admiration, etc.; ugliness inspires feelings of revulsion.

Beauty is not the same thing as taste. Tastes change, but beauty can be present whether something is currently admired or not.

Answer 5

--Interestingly a comment is made in the Bible that indeed shows the beauty was indeed purposed by the majestic Artist , God!

(1 Corinthians 15:40-41)" 40 And there are heavenly bodies, and earthly bodies; but the glory of the heavenly bodies is one sort, and that of the earthly bodies is a different sort. 41 The glory of the sun is one sort, and the glory of the moon is another, and the glory of the stars is another; in fact, star differs from star in glory."

--Usually color enhances beauty in just about everything, thus the "glory" or color makes every star unique and as in the Bible, where it explains that God names every star in the universe:

(Isaiah 40:26) 26 “Raise YOUR eyes high up and see. Who has created these things? It is the One who is bringing forth the army of them even by number, all of whom he calls even by NAME(my caps). Due to the abundance of dynamic energy,(His--my comment) he also being vigorous in power, not one [of them] is missing."
--Keep in mind that God's use of "dynamic energy"-has made the moons, planets, stars,solar systems, galaxies etc.-- very different because of the need for them to have more or less power to play their separate roles in the heavens.

--With stars having different names and their own unique beauty, such would be the case with all galaxies etc.

--No artist or photographer could even imagine capturing the full glory of everything in the universe that has already been on display for time indefinite, in all its majesty.--Yes indeed the beauty was made very objective!

Answer 6

Totally subjective. A beautiful woman with long flowing hair and beautiful nails - but - one of her hairs in your food? Nail clippings in your bed? Not so beautiful.

Answer 7

i in my opinion locate the male body very, very acceptable, notwithstanding the sexual allure does no longer really lie in his genital section for most women human beings. Sexual allure for the vast majority of ladies human beings lies extra frequently than not in his torso, hands, face...for this reason maximum ought to fairly see a guy's higher body as hostile to his decrease body. Arguably, the sexual allure does no longer merely fall interior of actual grounds and there is an allure in route of how he contains himself and how he speaks. this can be via biology, and how women human beings advanced to locate no longer merely adult adult males eye-catching yet what they had to provide besides. i do not understand if I trust this gay cognitive bias. For authentic, i really are not getting any stimulation from searching at different women human beings. fairly. you may tell me that it is in my subconscious, or maybe if it truly is or no longer i will't say, yet i ought to fairly look at a guy than a lady. even as women human beings look at different women human beings, we do respect, yet extra frequently than not by evaluation to ourselves, and likewise of ways eye-catching they could be to adult adult males. we are expecting of 'would not it is effective if I appeared like that?' this isn't for ourselves, precisely, yet because of what searching like that ought to get us. i ought to also favor to operate that years and years in the past, male beauty change into seen the merely precise beauty. All of those Greek statues of bare adult adult males were all symbols of means and sweetness. i will't provide info off the proper of my head, yet there is fairly some reality in the back of this in case you appeared it up. The male body really is acceptable, merely the media is biased in route of woman beauty, and arguably because adult adult males concentration extra on a lady's body- which hence causes her to with the intention to be extra eye-catching. i don't have self belief that the media focuses on female beauty because women all and multiple seems secretly fascinated in ourselves. it truly is what i will argue on a wakeful element, besides. If there is a few subconscious element then i really won't be able to say.

Answer 8

i.... dont think so