Also as I currently pay $11,700 a year in Child support and close to $6,000 in FWT and probably another $3,000 in FIca should I consider dealing drugs as a side job to make ends meet?
We need another drug dealer far more than we need to make the Family Court System fair to both parents. Am I correct?
2007-02-04 10:06:55 · 14 answers · asked by pretender59321 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
nope..he just revealed his true colors..he also did a flip flop on iraq today...liberals have no shame..none whatosever. taxes dont help the economy, they stifle it..liberals will never understand that.
2007-02-04 10:10:09 · answer #1 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
that is unhappy, yet Reagan develop into no longer keen on a conflict. are you able to get loose health care if you're making a lot less that $eighty,000 or is this yet another truly a style of "wealthy human beings" tricks. could Edwards loan Hillary's mdeia manager some funds t get a haircut. If I wasn't a lot into being a common man or woman that feels once you devote a criminal offense you do the time and certain bite the bullet if so, i'd develop right into a liberal democrat. so a strategies as i'm in touch any guy which will pay $400 for a hair shrink is doing some thing properly and could be about to do it again. I have a huge difficulty that Bush has given away the farm attempting to pacify each and each and every of the libs and it in common words makes them pick extra. They whine like little ones. that is insane and too a lot burden. he's likewise giving the country to the democrats, construct the fence. Peoplea are going to vote as they fell, except for the demos. No this isn't Reganomics, too quickly and under no circumstances an similar for that. a minimum of Edwards might want to sue Mexico and does no longer have all that "homicide and rape bags. I nevertheless ask your self why they don't bote for the perfect demoncrat and tha's Dennis, he's "the" democrat. Why do they shun him? He also has a trophy spouse someone advised me on solutions one time.
2016-11-25 01:55:53 · answer #2 · answered by haggans 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Y E S!
Get a second job to make ends meet, that would be better than a 8 by 10 jail cell.
N O!!To the last question. Write to your Congressman/woman and see if they can influence the Family Court System or reform it!!
2007-02-04 10:34:41 · answer #3 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just think how much of our tax money is going to go to just making the interest payments alone on all that debt we have already racked up.
You're having trouble making ends meet? If you have any outstanding credit card balances you can try making the minimum payments each month, that should cut down on your expenses.
It seems like the best thing for the security of our country and for younger generations would be to not leave so much debt.
Could a tax increase reduce that debt, bring down our interest payments and save us money to really grow the economy, instead of just servicing debt?
2007-02-04 10:34:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
John Edwards has a lot of nerve. He is a crooked lawyer who made his millions defending frivolous lawsuits that jacked up healthcare costs for us in the first place.
We don't need higher taxes. We need Medical Liability Reform to put a cap on this nonsense. Medical liability reform would decrease healthcare costs, freeing up more money to make insurance more affordable. It would also increase access to healthcare, as fewer doctors would be forced out of the profession or away from high-risk specialties because of overwhelming malpractice insurance premiums.
Do you think people really trust this ambulance-chasing sheister? I sure hope not...
I wonder if he is still talking to dead people?
2007-02-04 10:17:45 · answer #5 · answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't know why they even bother to give me a paycheck in the first place. Between taxes and my electric bill ($550 last month), I might as well be working for free. I wouldn't vote for Edwards even if I HAD a dollar left to my name anyway. At the rate we're going, I'll be dealing drugs with you.
2007-02-04 10:14:42 · answer #6 · answered by Jadalina 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He said only for the people who make $200.000 Two hundred thousand dollars a year or more!! Thats more than fair because anyone who makes $90.000 ninety thousand dollars doesn't pay any social security taxes!!!!
2007-02-04 11:43:10 · answer #7 · answered by dca2003311@yahoo.com 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The whole raise taxes is the belief of the Democratic Party not just Edwards. They want to take your heard earned money that you worked for and give it to the guy sittin at home on his couch because he didnt feel like finding work today.
2007-02-04 10:11:14 · answer #8 · answered by stewcat123 1 · 3⤊ 2⤋
To me, it would depend on who, and how much. If he wanted to raise taxes based on a person's income, maybe it wouldn't be so bad. But if he wanted to raise taxes where even the poor people would have to pay a lot, I would not like that.
2007-02-04 10:10:33 · answer #9 · answered by merlin_steele 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Edwards has a chance because he is a conservative democrat.
Obama and Clinton are more liberal, which is always a problem.
Kerry/Edwards reminded me of Dukakis/Bentsen (vp-runner being more conservative than frontrunner-which is losing combination.)
2007-02-04 10:29:35 · answer #10 · answered by david m 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I wonder how koalatcomics thinks we are going to pay back the astronomical debt Bush has gotten us into....... Should the country file bankrupcy so he won't have to pay his taxes?
2007-02-04 10:14:03 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋