2007-02-04 08:11:59 · 22 answers · asked by Baby 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
By the way people go do some research on Bystander Apathy or the Genovese Syndrome, before you start spouting all this crap about accomplices.
Athos- I believe you would be guilty of a lot of things!!
2007-02-04 11:47:17 · update #1
At last, a sensible question.?
Is it because only the innocent ones give interviews?
2007-02-04 08:17:49 · answer #1 · answered by selractrad 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are. But if they are good bystanders, they don't appear guilty, and thusly evade authority.
When I was a youth, my friends would rob the local market of the electronics they had near the front door. I refused to take part in stealing the goods, but I would wait outside the front door of the market, until the security would come rushing up to the door to catch the thief. At this time I would enter the exit door, or just generally throw my body in the way of the security people, tying them up, and giving my friends valuable escape time. Now when pulled of innocently, the security team has no idea that the two parties are connected, and usually would apologize for running into me, or knocking me over.
2007-02-04 08:17:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A bystander can be guilty by default if he or she lived in a state with "good Samaritan" laws. For example, if they lived in a state with these laws and watched as someone drowned without attempting to help, they could be arrested.
2007-02-04 08:15:55 · answer #3 · answered by Rachel 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ask a Lawyer / Solicitor ( depending where you are on the planet) andthey will tell you that there is no such thing as an innocent bystander - EVERYONE is guilty in their eyes until they can charge them enough to make them innocent....
2007-02-04 08:18:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you may want to be an probability free bystander or a accountable fleer (is that a note flee-er?). those are the in common words 2 recommendations-that is interior the rule of thumb e book, web page 489, section B article 9 and three quarters.
2016-11-25 01:36:01 · answer #5 · answered by iatarola 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A bystander is someone who had no part in whatever it was. If they had a part in it, then they can not fit the description of a bystander
2007-02-04 08:15:34 · answer #6 · answered by J R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there are always LOTS of guilty bystanders. If you see someone who needs help and you do nothing , then you are guilty.
2007-02-04 08:17:59 · answer #7 · answered by Mel R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I was aguilty bystander! But to something else, not related. Does that qualify?
2007-02-04 08:20:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because guilt implies an action that you regret.
You can't act and stand-by at the same time. (though it could be possible to be guilty due to not acting)
2007-02-04 08:14:34 · answer #9 · answered by DonSoze 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bystanders should be guilty.guilty of not helping.it should be a crime to just stand by and watch a crime take place
2007-02-04 08:15:55 · answer #10 · answered by the dreamy blonde 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋