English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I just don't understand with the National deficit being what it is how you can claim to support the war effort and the troops and not be willing to pay for it, can someone PLEASE explain how it is logical to bill our children for our decisions?

2007-02-04 07:11:50 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

TAx revenues are up but we still have a HUGE deficit nimrod who's going to pay for it?

2007-02-04 07:18:10 · update #1

I know outskip we can raise even more tax revenue by eliminating them all together under that theory RIGHT...........................

2007-02-04 10:12:04 · update #2

8 answers

Don't worry buddy, brother China is always there to help us.

This makes China really happy. With the budget deficit continually spiralling, we're owing China more and more. Who knows?, the Chinese might be even be hoping that the U.S. would be bogged down in the Iraq war for a long, long time. The war spending will be getting enormous and the budget deficit will continue to mount. And China reaping enormous profits just by sitting it out.

2007-02-04 09:01:27 · answer #1 · answered by roadwarrior 4 · 0 0

It is absolutley not logical. In the past the way that America showed it's support for the war was by paying additional taxes. Companies sarificed as well

The Neo-cons are Bankrupting our country with this ongoing nonsense. Wose yet the CBO just said the cost for the next two years (not counting the pending war with Iran) will be a quarter Trillion dollars. Meanwhile we have tax cuts for the wealthy.

2007-02-04 07:23:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

If you actually saw where all that money collected is going you could find a few hundred organizations that shouldn't be getting government money at all and could save billions. You don 't have to raise taxes you just cut back on the groups that don't need it, starting with grants for studying why the sky is blue a good start, lots of frivolous money being thrown around.

2007-02-04 07:20:56 · answer #3 · answered by Tapestry6 7 · 0 0

Take an economics course.

Tax rate is not the same as revenue generated. Here it is in simplified terms. A lot more money, taxed at a lower rate generates more revenue than a much smaller amount of money taxed at a higher rate.

I assume you may learn that in your junior year when you get to high school. Unless you go to public school. Then you'll have to be more active in independent learning.

2007-02-04 09:08:50 · answer #4 · answered by ouskip1998 2 · 0 1

How did we strive against a war in Iraq and not in any respect spend a dime? HOW? the position does the protection funds come from? devoid of war ought to there be taxes? i'd not provide them a cent for war because we favor to rigidity about whats occurring at living house. we've intense complications the following at living house and we deliver thousands of troops to overseas countries to die for someone elses reason. ????? elevating taxes for war can be a type of terrorism and that i'd not be a portion of that. criminal terrorism, that what it truly is.

2016-11-02 07:43:45 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Do you believe on doing the right thing, and do what you have to? If your neighbor throws something at you every time they see you, do you just ignore it, and went to shopping for fun because you believe these two different things are the same matter.

2007-02-04 07:30:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Federal Tax revenues are up more now than they were before the tax cuts.

your point is nonexistent

2007-02-04 07:15:42 · answer #7 · answered by chumpchange 6 · 0 1

You've got me there. I don't understand this either. Maybe they are the same ones who think that if you're overdrawn you can fix it by writing a check.

2007-02-04 07:15:46 · answer #8 · answered by teetzijo 3 · 0 1

Because republicans have a far-right conservative mindset that has detached them from reality

2007-02-04 07:15:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

only those on prozac

2007-02-04 07:15:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers