Is the question important? Tapes can be speeded up and slowed down. I don't see evidence of explosions on the lower floors.
I think there are a lot of unanswered questions about 9/11. If you look at controlled demolitons, it looks like explosives are place throughout the building, but the wtc buildings seem to collapse from the top down.
2007-02-04 06:54:35 · 8 answers · asked by sal 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
We all know what's happened.
Only a small % of us are talking about it or doing something about it. A large % know and are doing nothing. Most have a deep feeling but can't grasp it or admit it to ourselves because it's too horrible. Or some patriotic blockage.
2007-02-04 07:20:27 · answer #1 · answered by justagirl33552 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Lol...is your argument seriously that they should have fallen slowly? They were 100+ story buildings. Once they start to fall, they are not going to just lose a couple of floors at a time. That is beyond an idiotic thing to think. Do you have any idea what it takes for a controlled demolition of a building? You can't just throw a few sticks of dynamite in a few closets around the building. You need to place large amounts of explosives at very specific points on the structure and on certain supporting beams of the building. These aren't something you can sneak in in your pocket. Why don't you tell me... if your idea is that the twin towers were deliberately and systematically demolished, exactly WHEN the huge number of people it would have taken to set up the explosives all throughout the twin towers, at all the correct points, would have been able to get into the buildings and set up the explosives in order to CREATE a controlled demolition? And how they would have been able to DO this without being seen entering the building carrying multiple, gigantic packs of explosives by ANYONE, (there were people all throughout those buildings 24 hours a day) and done so without leaving any evidence behind like the gigantic holes they would have needed to make in the walls in order to place the explosives along the supporting beams? And how did they DO all of this without being captured on the thousands of surveillance cameras that were all throughout the twin towers? And how did they get into the building with thousands of pounds of explosives without also being captured by any of the multiple surveillance cameras that were all over the buildings OUTSIDE? (Not ONLY the twin towers themselves, but the buildings all around the twin towers?) I would be REALLY curious to hear you conspiracy theorist's explanation for that? Oooo...maybe the government has invented an INVISIBILITY potion, and they made themselves and the explosives INVISIBLE to get in! That must be it.
2016-05-24 04:42:08 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course they collapsed from the top down.The planes struck the towers in the upper floors.Once the intense heat caused the steel structure to give way the weight of the upper floors crashing down was more than the lower floors could support.You seem to imply something for which you have neither evidence or proof.And where were you during the Clinton years when the same towers were bombed?
2007-02-04 09:17:18 · answer #3 · answered by Michael R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND HOW THESE BUILDINGS WERE CONSTRUCTED. A PLANE WITH 10000 GALLONS OF JET FUEL WILL CAUSE IMMENSE DAMAGE. PEOPLE HAVE THAT DUMB THEORY IGNORE THE VERY BASICS OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF THESE BUILDINGS AND THE FIRES SOFTENING THE STEEL TO THE POINT WERE IS SOFT AND HAS NO STRENGTH. THESE BUILDING STAYED UP AN INCREDIBLE 1HR 25 MINS AFTER BEING STUCK. YOU CAN MAKE ALL KINDS OF IMPLICATIONS THAT HAVE NO MERIT AND NOBODY ASK FOR SOLID PROOF OF WHAT ALOT OF THESE CRACKPOTS SAY THEY JUST TAKE AT FACE VALUE WITHOUT ANY CONCRETE PROOF.
2007-02-04 09:06:59 · answer #4 · answered by SWEET SARAH 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think when they showed these things on television that they altered them to be okay to show on T.V. Meaning they would have to cut many things out. If it was me, i would show it all. the truth. Look at all the stuff on t.v now, and they cant even show something as important as that?
2007-02-04 07:06:58 · answer #5 · answered by RAW DIVA™ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In slow motion.
2007-02-04 13:17:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes they did...
Fishy ain't It???
One last thing......on that day...three buildings collapsed....all of them onto their own footprints...
2007-02-04 07:21:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Go to (Google) type in, loosechange, see for your self
2007-02-04 07:05:57 · answer #8 · answered by bodie 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋