He titled the book "If I did it". Do you think he's guilty or not and why? Does anyone care? lol
2007-02-04 05:50:38 · 9 answers · asked by ? 3 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
@@** HEY ROACHY-
I give a ****! I asked if anyone cared though so I pretty much left myself wide open for that one. P.S- A 6'2" dude with blue eyes can say whatever he wants :)
2007-02-04 06:09:53 · update #1
The Jury without a doubt got the verdict 100% correct, anyone who did watch the trial will agree, whether he was guilty or not, the prosecution failed to prove it:
The first cop on the scene pleaded the 5th when asked directly if he was racist.
The DNA on the glove was not an exact match for OJ's.
The glove did not fit, possibly the worst decision by Marcia Clark in the whole trial was to get Simpson to try on the glove and it did not fit. OJ's lawyer's 'The glove doesn't fit therefore you must aquit' line was legendry.
Whether I personally think OJ did it, well he might well of done but the jury could only in good faith come to one verdict, a verdict of not guilty.
Also another prosecution error, moving the trial to a predominately black area believing that black or white didn't make a difference, they just wanted a mostly female jury, believing women would find him guilty, another terrible error of judgement by Marcia Clark and her team.
2007-02-04 08:32:32 · answer #1 · answered by NM 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Definitely guilty he only got off with it because 1 he was a famous black guy 2 he was rich and finally 3 thet couldnt take the risk of upsetting the black community incase they had another riot
2007-02-04 06:03:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
How that man was ever allowed to go free i dont know and i would not buy the book also.I followed the court case and i was shocked whent hey returned the verdict of not guilty......Shoot the jurors and the judge.......
2007-02-04 06:03:15 · answer #3 · answered by GRANDMA 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He is definitely guilty. I watched the criminal trial. I can't understand the stupidity of the jury.
I didn't watch the civil trial in which he was found liable for wrongful death.
The book does seem to confirm his guilt. I guess OJ finally found the true killer, the one he said he was going to find.
2007-02-04 06:05:43 · answer #4 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In any European country he would have got 20 years.
In america- unfortunately- the rich are above the law.
2007-02-04 05:54:40 · answer #5 · answered by Not Ecky Boy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
he got off because of pro active liberal hype for the 'black' man
the rich as well do it often enough and walk
he just had xtra help
2007-02-04 05:54:34 · answer #6 · answered by farshadowman 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Guilty and I would not buy his book so he can earn money on his crime!
2007-02-04 05:54:35 · answer #7 · answered by interested_party 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was found innocent in a high profile court case.
2007-02-04 06:50:44 · answer #8 · answered by James Mack 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Who gives a S***T
2007-02-04 05:55:19 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋