English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Since the ratification of the constitution, problems between the federal government and state governments over the appropriate division of power has existed. HOW HAS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAINED POWER AT THE EXPENSE OF THE STATE GOVERNMENTS AND WHAT CAN STATE GOVERNMENTS DO TO REGAIN POWER?

2007-02-04 05:47:03 · 3 answers · asked by flowerkisses81 1 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

3 answers

They need to ban together and take it all back, through congress, it is congress that gave the federal govnment its power.

2007-02-04 05:52:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

As you know, the Articles of Confederation were too weak to preserve the United States. Basically, the states could act as their own countries, with no central power over currency, domestic policy, practically no national military, and other reasons, like one state one vote in Congress. So there needed to be more central authority. The question is where is the line where state rights over more important than central authority? The answer is in the Constitution, or should be.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/anncon/html/art4toc_user.html

So what rights do states have?

http://www.law.cornell.edu/anncon/html/amdt10toc_user.html

But, yes, the federal government has gained power, and there are conflicts. And it usually happens with amendments. But amendments like the Bill of Rights, 13, 15, 19,20, 22, while superseding states rights were necessary. But to prevent the federal government from infringing on states rights we have the ratification process which requires a 2/3 majority of either states or congress proposing the amendment and the 3/4 majority of the states to radii the amendment. It is very difficult to amendment the Constitution so states rights are superseded, due to the ratification process.

But I do agree. Federal government should be limited on domestic policies, with the exception of standard currency, national military, certain aspects of commerce, and to a very small degree business regulation, mostly in matters of protection of labor.

Excellent question. Thank you for asking an intelligent question instead for the usually rhetoric people ask.

2007-02-04 07:44:11 · answer #2 · answered by robling_dwrdesign 5 · 0 0

The 10th change says that any powers no longer given to the federal authorities are reserved for the states. those powers ought to easily accept to the federal authorities contained in the structure (both the unique textual content or the amendments). the federal authorities won't be able to easily provide itself any means it needs.

2016-11-02 07:28:51 · answer #3 · answered by gilbert 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers