Bush has purposely sent our men and women into conflict based on poor Intel which was cherry picked to get the desired result. All the while cracking jokes about where the WMD are at. This was done at a black tie event, and there are even tapes of this.
There are now more troops dead in Iraq than what occurred on 9/11, based on lies and deception. I don't buy that it is the troops fault for joining the military, because they know what could happen. When they joined they joined out of a desire to protect the US and NOT the oil reserves of other nations, which is exactly what happened. I remember that the nuke facilities which were located in Iraq were ignored and no one knows what happened to the stuff that was there. The only thing that was protected was the oil reserves. Not only that, but Bush has ignored the basic armor that the troops needed. How can a hypocrite say something that he himself is guilty of?
2007-02-04 05:43:58 · 20 answers · asked by hera 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Leogirl0804...I SERVED in the military for four years. And YOU? Didn't think so.
2007-02-04 05:52:41 · update #1
Fly... Bush is the CEO of the Government. "HE is the decider," or so Bush says!
2007-02-04 05:55:20 · update #2
meathead... What did I list above was opinion? Nothing. It is fact that Bush joked about NOT finding the WMD. It is FACT that there are now more of our men and women DEAD based on a lie, than on 9/11. It is FACT that they didn't protect the KNOWN nuke facilities upon invading, but did protect the oil reserves. Those nuke facilities were being tracked via an international nuke watchgroup who was monitoring them... Bush's bogus Intel to start the war said that Saddam was trying to buy enriched yellow cake from Africa. And no, what was there wasn't disposed of via the US because the locks were already broken. You really should keep up with the news, because the first story is always the closer to the truth than the spin that they put on it afterwards.
Iraq has already been lost. They have been in a civil war for the past 2 years and there isn't any way out of it. We should let the UN troops go in and deal with it, and save our troops to protect the US.
2007-02-04 06:25:06 · update #3
Bush isn't loyal to the troops, Bush could could care less about the troops. I also agree completely with what you have to say. The few times that he visited for 2 hours was a stunt to make Americans think he cares. If this war is so important to Americas survival, politicians would have their children fighting as well. All we are doing is making more people in more countries, angry. Bush is attempting to (and has been for quite sometime) to start WW III.
Everyone just assumes that the men and women who serve, do so for Bush and that we have a death wish, we know what we signed up for, that's true. However, we do it for our country and for our freedoms, which under Bush are becoming fewer and fewer. I would go to hell and back to ensure me families and my countries(however, thoughtless, manner-less and rude Americans are getting-not to bash anyone but look around...people have less respect today then they did 20 years ago) safety and freedom. But we are not in Iraq for that reason. We are there for the WRONG reasons. Iraq is our doorstep to Iran. Also, have you forgotten Afghanistan?
2007-02-04 05:58:41 · answer #1 · answered by Juicy Fruit 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Cubans Love America, where do you come up with your crappy ideas? Cuba is a symbol for much of the world on how the little guy on the block can stand up against the neighborhood bully and win. Communism is a footnote and of no consequence. If the US attacked Cuba directly or covertly at this point, the world would unite against us like never before. Let Cuba free itself over the next decade and recognize the huge respect Castro has around the globe.
2016-05-24 04:13:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do people ask a question and then rant on on a opinion based on rumor and not fact. Your comparison to our troops that were killed, to 9/11 is a shame and a sham. One day 4 hours 3000 dead compared to 4 years in a fight against an enemy is no comparison. What enemy were the victims of 9/11 fighting when they died ? At least our President says he is loyal, that is more than most Democratic leaders have shown. They have called them murderers, stupid, terrorist, etc etc etc.. Nice support there. The over 100 tons of yellow cake uranium was not ignored, if you would investigate, all was protected and disposed of by the US Government. Doesn't your remarks on this contradict your remarks about WMD ? Keep your eye on the truth just a little bit and give our troops all the support they need to finish the job.
2007-02-04 05:55:25 · answer #3 · answered by meathead 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Because like many,at the black tie affair, on here, and in the populous as a whole, George Bush has no idea what it is to be One of the troops,doing active duty in a war zone, He has little qualification to down-trod upon any soldier, and needs to be repremanded by someone his own age ,who did in fact, fulfill his obligation to his country,in a time of war,and go to Vietnam...I hearby volunteer for that mission, and will guarantee a successful and swift retaliation
2007-02-04 05:55:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
He was bashing bush not the troops. He is a war vet, BUSH IS NOT.
Bush lied and our men and women died.
We taught the foreigners to fly, opened our boards, and bush Sr. and Reagan sold them the weapons to do it. So 9/11 was bound to happen. Give them a shot and they are gonna use it.
We didn't make anything better by sending our men and women over to get killed and make Bush appear to have power. I dont see Bush's or Chaney's children or grandchildren fighting in this war !!
2007-02-04 05:50:47 · answer #5 · answered by tammer 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you totally,and I would like to add that oil was not the only reason for Iraq's occupation .There was another purpose which is to protect and defend Israel by destroying Iraq and its people as well as the personal motive (i.e) to revenge Saddam and to kill him .All that took place by using American young people as the fuel of this dirty war.
2007-02-04 05:59:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
He served them a delicious (plastic) turkey for Thanksgiving and conducted some of the most (er... coerced) troop interviews I've ever seen. Gee, how can you say Bush isn't loyal?
2007-02-04 05:54:08 · answer #7 · answered by Gemini 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Actually they had no wmd Israel destroyed them back in the 1980's. So the only thing we need to protect is oil and "democracy," which we don't even have in our own country.
2007-02-04 05:53:56 · answer #8 · answered by slickny8111 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Listening to supporters of Bush or Blair, is like listening to a beaten Wife defending her abusive Husband.
The troops are there for the 'false flag' operation to attack Iran around February 21st
2007-02-04 05:47:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
Bush is loyal to Bush. Your question gives food for thought
2007-02-04 05:49:52 · answer #10 · answered by joymlcat 3 · 6⤊ 0⤋