Liberals and Democrats, why bash Bush for this war, He wasn't the only one who thought it was the thing to do, I believe several Democrats voted for it, regardless what they are saying now! And you talk about how many of our troops are dying, Well from the Men and Women i've meet who have been over there it sounds like most of them agree with what they are doing and understand the dangers, And if that's the case then why would you want to interfere with what they believe? They are doing our country a great justice, we owe them our support and loyalty, You need to stop trying to speak for them, and direct your anger toward other issues, within this country that need to be addressed, because they don't need us getting in the way of their mission. Join PETA, OR try to get some of these sick Child molesters off the street, do something to help your country not hurt it.
2007-02-04 05:22:19 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
dze, It should be taken in consideration that the ones over there fighting or at least a great majority of them believe in this war, and people that are here complaining about it such as you should think about that, You aren't over there, and no ones forcing you.
And for the comment about finishing the job for daddy, that's getting old! You know that's not the truth, and if it is OH Well, it needed to be done. Bush sr. was a good president and if he suggested this to his son, there must have been good reason.
2007-02-04 05:33:41 · update #1
Well said. Unfortunately a liberal is not capable of doing any of those things. They hate America and love themeselves. Doing something that is greater than themselves is impossible for them. That's why there called, "the I want a pony crowd."
2007-02-04 05:27:44 · answer #1 · answered by Chester's Liver 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
The liberals and democrats bash Bush because he and his administration are corrupt and that is not just fantasy but fact as evidenced by the leaks, the favoritism ect. The facts speak for themselves he did lie to the world on Iraq and used some morally correct people like Colin Powell to do so, where was the resolve to stand behind us in Vietnam and where was the resolve then for the troops when they came home and were welcomed as child killers ect. Those that have never been in the service have no idea of the many people that follow the orders of an idiot just because they have higher rank, It is the duty of every american to speak out against things that are corrupt and not morally correct that is one of the things that democracy stands for the freedom to speak our minds with out the penalty that is imposed on other countries for doing so in this administration you have the right to voice your mind only if it agrees with them what a terrible thing to say that you fight for freedom while losing your own. No none are interfering with the troops and the job they are doing no more than those same people today that argued for the war with Vietnam did then and are doing now.
2007-02-04 13:32:30 · answer #2 · answered by billc4u 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The president is the decider, haven't you heard? Bush is the one, and the only one, who decided. He said so with his own mouth. He condemned himself. He's the commander. He's the decider. He's the uniter, not the divider. Everything rests with him. The inflated buck stops with him. So why shouldn't he take the blame? Congress isn't the Commander-In-Chief. I didn't see congress flying in landing on a battleship screaming, "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!" Did you? Or maybe you had your head up Foxx Noise Network. I didn't hear the Congressional State of the Union speech, did you? Now that the war is a total failure, everybody who's responsible for it wants to spread the responsibility around and blame congress. OK, it was a Republikan controlled congress you idiot.
2007-02-04 13:29:52 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I agree with you in that the local problems seem to be ignored in this time. The only reason why the big subject is the war is that we are losing and our elected have shown their true colors by blowing in the wind.
2007-02-04 13:30:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You're right. But it seems that the war is what highlights our era. We dont see child molesters in text books now do we?
2007-02-04 13:29:22 · answer #5 · answered by FLy 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush was the one who made it personal, "remember, this (hussein) is the guy who tried to kill my daddy", this and the need to place troops in the Middle East on a PERMANANT basis(Bases in Iraq) give lie to the lie
2007-02-04 13:27:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
we bash bush to show our disatisfaction that our leader whoever it may be .. is leading us into a more dangerous place in the world ... not a safer one ... and to just drop it and accept stupidity from our leaders would be unamerican ...
2007-02-04 13:27:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋