a question of ethics?

Question

do you think that the milgram experiment was right

yessubsequently women did participate in this experiment and the results were nearly the same

Answer 1

it's a tough question. it contributed so much to the field and follow up studies on those who participated show that almost none of them had long-term negative effects because of their participation. personally, i think that it was appropriate but i understand why modern ethical guidelines prevent it from being recreated

in response to the 1st poster, it's also important to remember that the people who were being "shocked" were not participants. they were milgram's research assitants. also, they were not actually shocked. the reason that the experiment has been questions is because the people who thought they were shocking someone were put through emotional stress when they were asked to do so

Answer 2

purpose Ethics refers to a view that someone's action can constantly be seen as ideal or incorrect, in spite of the region or the implications. It makes a speciality of rules for governing what's seen to be morally ideal, incorrect, or vital. the guy’s subjective assessment of the region isn't of plenty significance. it is the meaning given for human beings, so rules are given, accompanied. yet are they? Are rules stored, or are they sliding rules? As society variations, do not rules additionally replace? God follows rules that are placed forward for all people who stick to God, and God makes sparkling the implications of movements via folk. there are a number of 'if...then' propositions in the two testaments so we are able to extremely see the place issues stand. the version between 'regulation' and 'ethics' is given right here: regulation is a series of time-honored rules that are framed, widespread whilst many times enforced. Ethics on the different hand define how persons prefer to have interplay with one yet another. So, we see there might nevertheless be flexibility, purpose or not with ethics in accordance to the movements of society. God's procedures at the instant are not our procedures, and this should be additionally seen. using fact He seems the top from the beginning up and owns each little thing and every physique, we is easily not on par with Him.

Answer 3

ethically yes. it exposed something very important about the human animal. i can see how some people could have a problem with it, involved false pretense basically lying to the subject. also the whole shocking people, even though it wasn't real. ultimately though means are justified by the results. was there a better, or "ethical" way to prove what was proved?

Answer 4

It was no less ethical than sacrificing life in war to keep life in other places constant. It's information we need to know unless you want more conformity and war. People's freedoms were at stake.

Who cares if women didn't volunteer for this it proves nothing more than a sexist brain of poor justifications.

Answer 5

There is really nothing right or wrong... Depends on how you look at it. He was one of a kind and he did it. Don't try to replicate :-)

But seriously, this goes back to the question of science and cost-benfit analysis.

Answer 6

Yes, this experiment is extremely right and the ethnic is correct too. Proof of life experiment is exemplary of my life in Singapore.

My life is screwed by bad government officers and now I am 247 under their nonsense watch. And they have any doubt or unhappy with me, they will instruct ordinary folks to do their dirty bidding on me. E.g. Watch me what I am doing alone at corner of shopping and later feedback with info to those bad officers. And the folks do it without question ethically of why?.

Another one is the intention to hurt on other by way asking the obedience one to do one's evil bidding. It happened today on my gf's birthday. Bad Authority corrupted the resturant u intended to have a Tim Sum. And the boss and the employee of the resturant obey totally by giving us a super hot chrysanthemum tea pouring into your tea pot and u know it's hot but unknownly it's super hot that it can burn your finger and tongue. I hold the cup after pouring, my finger got burn and my tongue got burn. How I know 100%? because other table when requesting the same for the very first time, they can hold the cup and drink comfortly at once yet I can't? Next, upon arriving, we have a assigned table which it is not ready to have a Tim Sum yet we are given that unready table for meal. How I know 100% again? When the other 2 tables meal was finished and the guess left, they were clean and immediately for the next guess at once and why the one and only table of us is not ready?

There are many scenarios I can list but lazy and u can email me for detail if u wanna.

Milgram summed things up in his 1974 article, "The Perils of Obedience", writing:

The legal and philosophic aspects of obedience are of enormous importance, but they say very little about how most people behave in concrete situations. I set up a simple experiment at Yale University to test how much pain an ordinary citizen would inflict on another person simply because he was ordered to by an experimental scientist. Stark authority was pitted against the subjects' [participants'] strongest moral imperatives against hurting others, and, with the subjects' [participants'] ears ringing with the screams of the victims, authority won more often than not. The extreme willingness of adults to go to almost any lengths on the command of an authority constitutes the chief finding of the study and the fact most urgently demanding explanation.

Ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process. Moreover, even when the destructive effects of their work become patently clear, and they are asked to carry out actions incompatible with fundamental standards of morality, relatively few people have the resources needed to resist authority.[4]

These conclusion statements are factually truth.

Add on comment : Even willingly extending the risk of oneself to complete the risk of injuries of other task given by the authority without question the right of moral.

Correct about women. My gf obeys the bad authority to do their evil bidding on me too.

I am from Singapore. Like to know more about it? Email me then. hehe...But bewarned of those bad one noses on you because of me. any Brain wave life detector for my truth fact or haox? Love to take the test immediately.

Oh yes, check my answer profile too.. u will realise one common things - any sensitive related to bad authority with facts are alway thumb down immediately. lol...check it out, ethnically. hehe..

Answer 7

no