I know that the UN has proclaim that the earth is getting hotter and we are the cause.
This question is for those with some intellect could you please answer these with some logical and reasoned explanation because our news media and politicians as politicize this.
1. why as there been no mention of increase solar activity in the last 12 years, and why as the ice cap on mars melting.
2. the earth temp as increase a little over 1 degree in the last hundred years in the recent pass the earth temp has increase by as much as 4 degrees why were we not blamed then?
3 What percentage of carbon dioxide going into the atmosphere is man made and what percentage is by nature.
4. In the past global warming and cooling has had disasterous affect on certain part of the globe it as also bought benifit to certain part of the globe, for ex places that was too cold to grow crops so why is this process always looked at as a negative.
There are dozens of questions I could asked but am limited by s
2007-02-04
05:00:18
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Ynot!
6
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Just as though! so far nothing from the zealots of detail explanation to any of my 4 questions.
2007-02-04
05:13:10 ·
update #1
Man has influenced global warming ever since we tamed fire. The main reason politicians and politically connected scientist want to shove human influenced climate change down our throat is because they want to hold countries accountable for the pollution we spew. Once the warming has been established as a fact, the international lawsuits will start rolling in. So what are we going to do? Ban fossil fuels, motorized transportation, power plants, wood burning, farming? All contribute significantly to the man made portion.
Human beings will eventually die out long before they can permanently destroy the earth. Our planet will recover no matter what we do.
2007-02-04 05:13:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by All_Dawgs_Go_To_Heaven 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ask them what the weather will be on March 23rd? No answer from the Scientists! Ask them to give a detailed weather map of the Northeast for July 4th 1776, and they cannot do it! an we are supposed to believe the BS they are NOW 100% sure of? How about the Global Freeze they Pushed as Fact in the 80's ??? If we all opened our windows and turned up the heat could we then go swimming in NYC in January?? this is a ploy for the UN to TAX Americans! Let's stop the polluting production and distribution of food and medicine for all the rest of the world and when 100 million die maybe a few will shut up about Global warming...
2007-02-04 05:07:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Overall I think the evidence is incontrivertible that the earth is warmer. I think the true debate should have started with we need to define the cause rather than the Bush Co approach which was deny a problem existed. He lost credibility and now wont be able to argue effectively as to the cause. Denying there was a problem implied that he was protecting industry and therefore the basically said it was man made. I dont agree with the manmade idea and think its actually multifactorial. But at this point as its a political rather than a scientific question. Its asked and answered because the political will in america is that global warming is man made.
2007-02-04 05:05:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
for one thing .. releasing carbon into the atmosphere trapped in fossil fuel over millions of years and then released in the span of a few decades has to have an effect .... for another thing .. the regular phases of climate change have been regular for as far back as they can date in the ice ... there is a record of that in the ice, and the change for the warmer in the past few years is off the charts and abnormal ... glaciers worldwide are extremely receding and ice fields are melting everywhere ... the glaciers diappearing promise water shortages in areas that depend on them for fresh water and the major fresh water dump in the atlantic from the melting ice in the north threatens to turn off the oceanic pump that runs the gulf stream accelerating the melt even faster ... if u dont think theres a problem u should think again ... this is our planet we are talking about and we only have one shot at preserving it ... to sit back and do nothing would be the worst sin commited by mankind ...
2007-02-04 05:09:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
While there are natural forces that control the earth's temperature, there is a very direct correlation between the amount of fossil fuels burned and the average temperature of the earth. In fact, if you make a graph of both since the industrial revolution, and lay one over the other, they match almost exaclty. Global warming is not longer just a hunch. The only question now is can we stop it or is it too late?
2007-02-04 05:05:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by SDTerp 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
they're "real Believers" who're extraordinarily much all of a Leftist innovations-set. they're in denial of the possibility that they may be incorrect. They mindlessly help "Doing something" with no need the slightest concept of what its impression may be. To them absolutely everyone who disagrees with them might desire to be stupid, simply by fact they be attentive to they're the superb option. to realize the targets they think in they're prepared to alter the information, lie, libel, slander and denigrate the contest. look on the temperature information from the top of the Ice Age in the previous, the Holocene era, those the GW supporters have not doctored to make their theories artwork. look at photograph voltaic interest information they have not suppressed. we've been warming up from the medieval Little Ice Age which relatively ended approximately 1815. look on the quicker heat era whilst the Vikings grew wheat in Greenland. relatively calculate the tiny quantity of CO2 human interest produces and ponder whether reducing that, destroying technological civilisation, is worth slowing climate replace via an infinitesimal quantity. undergo in innovations that one large volcanic eruption cam placed extra greenhouse gasses into the air than all of human interest for the duration of historic past. they'll call you a "denier" a label meaning you oppose the fact. A Zealot is in basic terms somebody who fiercely believes in something. regrettably the GW people refuse to take heed to in a spirit of provide and take, simply by fact their personalities are incapable of that. a genuine Leftist has the comparable form of character, do no longer attempt to confuse them with information, simply by fact their tiny minds are already made up.
2016-10-01 10:16:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The real question is if you are wrong and I am right, do you want your grand children and great grand children to pay the price of our indiscretions. The other stuff is to cloud a very complex issue. The fact is it is happening and needs to be corrected if at all possible in order to head off any catastrophes in the future if at all possible. Try and remember we all share the planet and we are all responsible for its upkeep.
2007-02-04 05:13:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Who the hell cares? It's not hurting us to stop future global warming if theres no global warming now. If we start now, we can prevent it. Get your goddamn facts straight.
2007-02-04 05:06:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by FLy 1
·
1⤊
2⤋
amen, brother. i think all the global warming 'tards out there should stop talking. it releases more carbon dioxide into the air...
2007-02-04 05:05:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by DeceptiConservative 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
Can you say, buffoon? I bet you can, yes.
2007-02-04 05:04:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋