2007-02-04 04:29:43 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Maybe but John Edwards is a close 2nd. On Meet the Press with Tim Roughit he said, well he was for it until about a year ago, voted for it, ran as VP supporting it but now he thought it over and is now against it. lololol Now he blames everything on Bush.
Do these people think we're stupid and can't see thru them?
2007-02-04 04:35:48 · answer #1 · answered by americanmalearlington 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The ability to ascertain new information,and deviate from a prior path,to accommodate a newer and hopefully better path to follow is by no means a sign of weakness,but points the way for great leadership and guidance,the opposite however,"maintain the present course regardless of loss and defeat," is an absolute sign of misconception and arrogance
2007-02-04 04:37:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The flippity-floppity argument is so over-used, over-rated and irrelevant. The one glaring fact is that George W Bush and the Republikan Neo-Con War Mongers got us into this war and if some idiot politician wants to flip-flop now and end it, so be it. Better to flip-flop and look indecisive and stop the war, than to stay the course and bomb the hell out of Iran and end up floppity-flippity on life itself dont you think? Oh, that's right.....you DONT think, do you?
2007-02-04 04:44:44 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
What in the hell do you call Bush? "Wanted Dead or alive" to.."I am not all that concerned with him"
Or what about "We are there to make sure we protect the US from WMD" even when there were many people telling him that Iraq wasn't trying to get Nukes and that it wasn't good intel Bush was basing his decisions on.
Or what about "We wont be nation building if we attack Iraq" To WHAT are we doing now? Nation building. Notice we haven't seen a drop of oil to finance this little jaunt either!
2007-02-04 04:52:52 · answer #4 · answered by hera 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hitlery may be the most recent but this is definitely not something new to her, or the democratic party in general. It's not really fair for us Republicans to dislike the Mislead party for their ignorance. After all, their official party Slogan is "We're against what ever THEY said.... Unless that will hurt us politically."
So while we vote and elect officials based on what we believe in, our values and according to our ideology, the Dems vote and elect officials based on anything that goes AGAINST those traditions. This is why they get in trouble when it comes to taking a stance on something, because they really have no real values accept for pandering to what they THINK the public wants to hear. With the Dems not having their favorite scape goat for all of America's problems (Bush) to go on a tear about in the upcoming presidential election, I think we're going to see a lot of flip-flopping.
So, in the immortal words of liberals everywhere.
"We're against the war in Iraq, unless, of course, you're for it, in which case, so are we!!!"
2007-02-04 04:44:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes and she is doing it for personal gain.
In a demoralizing message to U.S. soldiers serving in Iraq, visiting U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton told them that Americans back home were growing increasingly skeptical of President Bush's decision to send them into battle.
2007-02-04 04:42:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I love it - "Shrillary"!! LOL! Yes, they keep on comin' but I believe she is latest to do an about face on this issue.
2007-02-04 04:40:33 · answer #7 · answered by Jenny A_331 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Put that to some rap, throw some bling-bling on and you've got a best seller.
2007-02-04 04:41:56 · answer #8 · answered by Shrink 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
yes, hillary was lied to and shown 'edited' intelligence.
just like the rest of america.
hillary's biggest problem is that she's not anti-war ENOUGH!
2007-02-04 04:36:59 · answer #9 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
One of many!
2007-02-04 05:03:12 · answer #10 · answered by Hunter 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋