English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2 answers

He developed an alternative to the Hobbesian state of nature and argued a government could only be legitimate if it received the consent of the governed through a social contract and protected the natural rights of life, liberty, and property. If such consent was not given, argued Locke, citizens had a right of rebellion.

2007-02-04 04:24:30 · answer #1 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 0 0

It is known as the social contract between government and the people. Both government and the people have distinct roles. The idea is that humans abandoned a natural (free and ungoverned) state in favor of a society that provides them with order, structure, and most importantly, protection. The government should protect the citizens rights of life,liberty, and property. People agreed to live under a common government. Following a universal law is the duty of the citizens to protect the government that offers this law to them. Citizens have a binding contract among themselves.

2016-03-29 04:30:41 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers