What is the psychological study of moral conduct and duty called ?

Answer 1

IDK

Answer 2

you does not be insane yet extremely clever. I might desire to point that the inspiration of maximum persons of ethical code of the Western international (fairly here in Europe) isn't Hebrew yet somewhat is Platonic. additionally the Hebrew ethical code itself could be challenged on the subject of its foundation, as an occasion the adverse Confession to Ma'at in financial disaster a hundred twenty five of the Egyptian e book of the lifeless features a ethical code which bears unbelievable (if not comparable) similarity to the guidelines of the Torah, which it extra effective than possibly predates. To adventure life through fact the ancients did is purely about impossible interior the society which the West embodies although by way of learn and the utility of mind (and likewise initiation into an real custom) you're able to arrive at a ethical understanding very comparable. although i might advise that, somewhat than appearing Necromancy on those long long gone cultures, one takes all which you're able to learn from them on an identical time as acknowledging the skill of non secular evolution which posits that beyond prevalent time symbols replace. evaluate not the previous Age yet somewhat herald regards to the hot Aeon.

Answer 3

The term "ethics" is used in several different ways. First, it means the study of morals. It is also the name for that branch of philosophy concerned with the nature of morals and moral evaluation - e.g., what is right and wrong, virtuous or vicious, and beneficial or harmful (to others). Second, the term ethics or morality is used to mean the standards for ethical or moral behavior of a particular group, such as "Buddhist ethics" or "nursing ethics" or "Roman Catholic morality" or "the professional ethics of engineers in the twentieth century United States." To give a description of such ethical codes and standards is descriptive ethics, . Descriptive ethics does not require making a judgment as to whether the code or standards of behavior have ethical justification. Examination of the adequacy of moral or ethical values, standards or judgments is normative ethics. Third, some authors even use the term "ethics" or "morality" more loosely to mean any code of behavior, even one that does not claim to have moral justification. For example, Robert Jackall in Moral Mazes describes what he calls a corporation's "ethics" or "morality" and takes it to include such judgments as "What is right is what the guy above you wants from you."(p. 6) Such a judgment is about the best (i.e., most effective) way to survive in the organization, but does not pretend to be a statement about what is morally/ethically justified. It may be important to examine such codes of behavior and see how they affect the opportunities for moral action, but not every code of behavior has, or is even claimed to have moral/ethical justification. The term "moral" tends to be used for more practical elements, such as "moral problems" and "moral beliefs", and "ethical" tends to be used for more abstract and theoretical elements, such as "ethical principle", but the distinction is by no means hard and fast. Some philosophers and theologians have drawn a distinction between the moral and the ethical. They have drawn such a variety of different distinctions, however, that to use any one of them invites confusion with the others. Therefore the terms "ethical" and "moral" are used interchangeably here.


Duty or Obligation:
Requirements arising from a person's situation or circumstances (e.g., relationships, knowledge, position) that specify what must or must not be done for some moral, legal, religious, or institutional reasons. For example, students have an obligation see their advisor on or before Registration Day. People have a moral obligation to keep their promises. Notice that usually statements of obligations specify what acts are required or forbidden without reference to the consequences of performing the act (except in so far as these consequences are a part of the characterization of the act itself - for example, killing is an act that results in death). However, occasionally you will see such statements as "engineers have an obligation in their work to ensure the public safety," which mean that engineers are morally required to ensure the public safety but which do not specify what acts they should or should not perform in order to ensure safety. A legal obligation is a legal requirement that specifies what types of actions are permitted, forbidden, or required on legal grounds. Often legal obligations are monetary debts. When we speak of an obligation without specifying its nature we will mean a moral obligation.

Answer 4

Confusion.

Answer 5

I don't know.

Answer 6

Isn't that ETHICS?