2007-02-04 04:05:25 · 8 answers · asked by DXTRCHN11 6 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
I think it should be played in NFL cities. Once it wasn't played in an NFL city. I don't remember which one, but a Super Bowl was played in Stanford Stadium in San Jose. I think it was in the early 80's.
2007-02-04 04:12:13 · answer #1 · answered by Jack O'Lantern 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I think every city which has an NFL team should have an opportunity to host the Super Bowl. Not just warm weather cities, or cities with a domed stadium.
2007-02-04 12:14:34 · answer #2 · answered by Feathery 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The owners get a ton of revenue from this one game, so the possibility of this is unlikely. The unofficial policy is the team with a new stadium gets the game. Like Houston got, and supposedly Dallas will get.
2007-02-04 12:13:56 · answer #3 · answered by Billy Dee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it should rotate between all nfl cities, it could be in Green Bay today. It's -10 degrees, wouldn't that be fun.
2007-02-04 12:09:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
at this point the answer is no.... the nfl has just recently started holding regular season games in other countries in large cites such as london and tokyo....
2007-02-04 12:09:30 · answer #5 · answered by justmejie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think they should be played in college stadiums. most major college stadiums pack in at least 85,000 a lot put in over 100,000 so there would be more money made, and no shot at home field advantage
2007-02-04 13:17:21 · answer #6 · answered by gofightinirish35 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2007-02-04 12:26:57 · answer #7 · answered by LiL MiKeY 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2007-02-04 12:17:50 · answer #8 · answered by TITANS FAN 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋