Is space curvature in Universe realy inversely proportional to the surface density of a Mass Structure?

Answer 1

Assuming that this theory is correct, it is inversely proportional to the surface curvature of the mass structures contained within it. Or something.

Answer 2

i think of you have joined a pair of distinctive concepts on your questioning. a million. a large sufficient mass turns into around simply by fact of its very own gravity. in basic terms smaller products, like asteroids and Mars's moons can stay irregularly shaped. 2. Einstein's concept of well-known relativity offered us with the 1st concept of gravity. (Newton's assertion is a regulation, no longer a concept. He stated how gravity acts, no longer what motives is.) Einstein proposed that mass curves the gap around it. we don't word the curve of area, however the end result's that products that are "relatively" vacationing at present strains stick to the curve of area (or area-time, relatively). Their paths regarded curved to us. We clarify the (curiously) curved paths via exclaiming that the products are being attracted via a gravitational rigidity coming from the mass. So, watching your question: Mass in area motives the curvature of area, ensuing in what feels like the rigidity of gravity to us. The rigidity of gravity makes very large hundreds around.