Should Historians who question some aspects of the Holocaust be?

Question

A. Jailed for spreading hate?
B. Fired from their jobs?
C. Shouted down, ridiculed and called names?
D. Allowed to debate their points of view in the sprit of academic freedom?

Answer 1

D.

These historicans are called "revisionist' historians, and currently they have been jailed, fined, made to look like Jew haters, when in fact they are not.

The points that they bring to the table are valid and worth looking into. The victors of war are the ones that write the history books. The questions raised consistently by the revisionist historians is A) "How is is mathematically possible to murder 6 million people in a 3 1/2 year span?" B) In concentration camps the historians are Jewish and there is very credible evidence that they have lied about the manner of death, the amount of deaths, and those who were murdered. It is as if they wish to show that it was only a Jewish person who was murdered, when in fact more Catholics, Gypsies and those who did not fit the physical profile that the Nazi Regime wished to promolugate. It was not just Jews killed but many historians will say so. With these questions it should be allowed a free debate. The probablity of that occurring is very small however because as I stated above to even remotely question the Holocaust you are made into a anti semite and all is done to assist in losing credibility, i.e., loss of reputation, job, fined and even jail.