Exxon-Mobil declares record profits, while poor Americans die in Iraq after the President invades it based on lies.
2007-02-04 02:25:38 · 16 answers · asked by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Minstrel - the two are connected. No record profits for oil companies without imperial wars for oil.
2007-02-04 02:31:30 · update #1
They created this country and fought the British so their sons, and their sons could be intellectuals, artists, thinkers, architects, etc, and live in peace and prosperity. Read what they said.
2007-02-04 02:38:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Knowledgeable News Audiences
News audiences vary widely in age, education, and how much they know about what's going on in the nation and the world. Most regular consumers of news are better informed, better educated, and older than the average American. But the audiences for some news sources stand out in this respect.
Judged by their answers to three news knowledge questions2, the most informed audiences belong to the political magazines, Rush Limbaugh's radio show, the O'Reilly Factor, news magazines, and online news sources.
Audiences with the highest educational achievement, by far, are the literary magazines and online news outlets. Readers of news magazines, political magazines and business magazines, listeners of Rush Limbaugh and NPR.
Some of these attentive and educated audiences also are older than average. The oldest audiences belong to the NewsHour (60% age 50 or older), the O'Reilly Factor (58%), Larry King Live (56%), network nightly news (54%), and Sunday morning talk shows (52%).
The Center is an independent opinion research group that studies attitudes toward the press, politics and public policy issues. We are best known for regular national surveys that measure public attentiveness to major news stories, and for our polling that charts trends in values and fundamental political and social attitudes. Formerly, the Times Mirror Center for the People & the Press (1990-1995), we are now sponsored by The Pew Charitable Trusts and are one of six projects that make up the Pew Research Center, a nonpartisan "fact tank" that provides information on the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world.
http://www.googlesyndicatedsearch.com/u/peoplepress?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=limbaugh&spell=1
2007-02-04 03:05:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No they intended for America to be a secular nation. The settlers escaped a theocracy and the founding fathers were aware of that when they wrote the constitution.
It is only in a secular society that freedom of choice can truly exist.
In a country that has freedom of religion all religions should have a voice or NO voice.
If the ten commandments are in school then all other religions should be represented as well.
There is no Officially recognoized religion in America or at least the list is very long.
2007-02-04 02:43:01 · answer #3 · answered by Eyota Xin 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think they would be shocked to see what has happened. Many freedoms they had are gone and new freedoms are available .
I think they would be excited to see the profits of Exxon-Mobile. And surprised at the lack of support the People give the President in the war. Dissent is one thing. But actually working to loose is another.
They would be surprised to see how close we are to becoming socialist and the talk of wealth redistribution and supporting those that don't work.
They would be fascinated by the computer, Internet and availability of knowledge.
Most of all they would be proud their system worked.
2007-02-04 02:44:22 · answer #4 · answered by Luchador 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
A 'Faction' as expressed by Franklin would be identified here as well as an erosion of civil rights.Bush is preparing the way for the Republicans to regain control by legalizing hemp production in order to reduce our dependence on oil.
2007-02-04 02:36:05 · answer #5 · answered by stratoframe 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They most certainly would be pleased by Exxon Mobil's record profits.
They would be outraged by George Bush and just about everything else thats happened in Washington the last couple of decades.
2007-02-04 02:30:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
under no circumstances "the assumption additionally of a union of all to variety one u . s . under one government in acts of devotion to the God of all is an enforcing concept. yet reason and the concepts of the Xn faith require that all and sundry the persons composing a rustic even of the comparable precise creed & needed to unite in a extensive-unfold act of religion on the comparable time, the union might desire to be effected thro’ the intervention of their non secular no longer of their political representatives. In a rustic composed of countless sects, some alienated severely from others, and the place no contract might desire to happen thro’ the former, the interposition of the latter is double incorrect" -- James Madison; from 'indifferent Memoranda' The Christian the superb option has yet another source for his or her ideology: "The national government will regard it as its first and optimum accountability to restore in the country the spirit of solidarity and co-operation. it is going to look after and preserve those issue-unfastened concepts on which our u . s . has been outfitted. It regards Christianity simply by fact the beginning place of our national morality, and the kin simply by fact the muse of national life." -- Adolf Hitler; from national proclamation (February a million, 1933)
2016-10-01 10:06:16 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know they didn't intend for government control of our economy, people declaring the "right" to kill an unborn child, gay marriage, and other liberal pet causes. The fact that these men and women are VOLUNTEERING to put their lives on the line to defend our country, and are VOLUNTEERING to keep going back there might tell people something, but obviously you aren't listening.
2007-02-04 03:01:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes because history is not a constant. Different events in history call for different measures, based on the threat or subject at the time. They would not be pleased with burning any draft cards since they knew what it was like to fight for freedom.
2007-02-04 02:33:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
the founding fathers saw us as a nation of agrarian farmers, with no bosses or imperial quests! Banking is something they adopted as an afterthought in order to ALLOW commerce, not to have the nation controlled by banking and commerce!
2007-02-04 02:35:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋