2007-02-04 02:23:58 · 12 answers · asked by Sankaranamasivayam K 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
INDIA HAD NOT OPPOSED THE DEATH SENTENCE OF SADDAM HUSAIN BUT IT HAD GIVEN ITS CONCERN THAT IT WAS NOT WISE DECISION.
2007-02-07 20:35:38 · answer #1 · answered by RAMAN IOBIAN 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
1) India never had any problem in dealing with Saddam officially.
2) He was not a fundamentalist while handling India and religion did not come in the way of his handling relations with other countries.
3) India is making pro-Saddam noise, only to keep pace with the prevailing opinion in the region. If India welcomes the sentence and make Pro-American noise, we will be branded as an ally of the USA. You will have problem with the local Communists, whose support for the government is crucial for its survival. You will have problem in your relations with USSR and China and other Muslim countries.
2007-02-07 20:31:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blair isn't adversarial to the dying sentence for Saddam Hussein and he has stated as a thank you to his political allies. the clarification he won't say so right it relatively is simply by fact somebody will ask him why we don't have the dying penalty right here. This became into common the day previous whilst he lost his rag enormous time with a reporter who asked him in basic terms that query. It became into large to be sure him lose it as he knew he became into cornered!
2016-10-01 10:06:08 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sadam was friend of India.Even tough he was Muslim leader he was first person or you can say while time he was ruling Iraq he was first person to come out saying Kashmir is part of India.he was person who treated Man & women similar which no other Muslim ruler has ever done.
2007-02-04 04:15:28 · answer #4 · answered by mehta.amit 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's over India, Saddam is gone, move on
2007-02-04 05:46:42 · answer #5 · answered by Vinod 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
who said like this nonsense , in india more than 90 % are in favour of this and rest of all are idoit because they may be polticians,and terrorists.
2007-02-04 02:55:24 · answer #6 · answered by blacklad_666 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is just because indians feel that US s attack on Iraque was an immoral act and he was not given fair trial . Rather justice was alltogether denied and it was totally farce.
2007-02-04 02:34:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because they have respect for justice and human life, more than the US anyhow.
2007-02-04 02:53:40 · answer #8 · answered by airmonkey1001 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
because india is opposite to hung death.........every Indian will feel bad even though a enemy dies....... for an example see AFFZELS ..... case. what happen......??????
2007-02-04 02:55:52 · answer #9 · answered by DUTT CHAITU 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Common Sense?, I mean....did it really solve anything?
2007-02-04 02:42:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋