2007-02-04 02:14:22 · 40 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
Where do you suggest they come out of? Their @ssholes?
2007-02-04 02:16:34 · answer #1 · answered by INDRAG? 6 · 7⤊ 2⤋
Assuming you are adult enough to ask this question then I will try to give you an adult answer.
If you believe in the Biblical creation of man then you would know that in the Garden of Eden after Adam and Eve had eaten the apple God punished Eve by making her suffer the bearing of Children and the "monthly" curse of her womb.
Now if you believe in the Scientific creation of man then all life forms have either male or female organs, (some were even blessed with both). The male organs of these lifeforms deposit the seed, The female organs are the vessels that grow the seed.
Or to be even simpler a Man delivering a baby would be pretty shitty!
2007-02-04 02:32:54 · answer #2 · answered by irishinjun2005 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a biological male I've always found this grossly unfair.
Now that they've managed to do the first womb transplant, I expect it will not be so far off in the future before a man receives a transplanted women, is impregnated and has a baby. I guess I'm too old but I would volunteer if I could.
2007-02-04 08:20:11 · answer #3 · answered by Augusta B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, if this is a serious question, the short answer is biology. men were not designed to have babies. but...there is a rare occuring phenomenon called an eptopic(spelling?) pregnancy, where the growing baby attaches itself to another one of the mothers organs. so technically, you do not need a womb to carry a baby. but, it is very dangreuous, usually the baby is lost and the mothers life is put in danger.. perhaps science will find a way for men to one day carry babies....
2007-02-04 02:47:02 · answer #4 · answered by weeping_orchid 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I realize that you will probably hate my answer, but what exactly are you trying to say, and what is going on in your mind to make you think you have to ask the question?
To ask this question is like asking the sky why it can't be bright at night and dark during the day. Because that is its natural state of being as decided by karma. Nothing more, nothing less.
2007-02-04 02:19:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If men could have kids, they'd be women, not men.
2007-02-04 02:20:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
According to the scriptures, bearing children was Eve's punishment ( and all her female descendants) for picking the apple of knowledge and then tempting Adam with it. Woman would have to suffer in childbirth...
Personally, I think the God of the Bible must have been a man, and a misogynist to boot!
2007-02-04 02:50:34 · answer #7 · answered by WISE OWL 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Our bodies are not designed to have babies. We don't have a vagina, womb or wide enough hips. Thank goodnesss because I wouldn't like to go through the pain of having one.Its hard enough having to go to the pub and watch football.
2007-02-04 02:21:41 · answer #8 · answered by Birdman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because they're better at stuff like moving heavy things for us, working on our cars, giving us foot massages, watching those kids we had so we can go out with our girlfriends, etc, etc. (Not to mention they probably couldn't handle the pain of childbirth anyway) :)
2007-02-04 02:19:03 · answer #9 · answered by Kris 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because
1. They are not equipped
2. They have a low pain threshold
3. They would never cope with the pain of childbirth
4. Men would have to go to bed for 9 months
2007-02-04 02:21:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
The only one that can answer that question is mother nature, who gave the uterus to the female gender. As far as I am aware, she doesn't post on YA so you'll not get a valid answer to your inquest.
2007-02-04 02:36:10 · answer #11 · answered by American Spirit 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋