English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Seeing those are the only 2 countries that actually enforce UN guidelines,how many will it take? As many as Saddam had or less?

2007-02-04 01:35:47 · 10 answers · asked by BAARAAACK 5 in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

Much much more. Millions will need to die. The UN has shown us all they know how to do is write resolutions, they don't know how to punish those who violate. The good news is though if you need drugs trafficked under diplomatic immunity they are darn good at that.

2007-02-04 01:45:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Iran will be different than Iraq. Iran will start the conflict before anyone else will. Look at there governments words. They openly defy confrontation. As of now they do not have the UN helping violate their sanctions. That was the difference with Iraq. The sanctions were not working because the UN was on the take with Iraq and its leaders. We knew it and acted on it.

2007-02-04 09:42:30 · answer #2 · answered by meathead 5 · 1 1

Well they failed with Iraq (17) so will be the same with Iran. The UN is a failure. Again ole longhair is wrong again

denial of the truth is a classic action of hippies they post propaganda but criticize the truth

2007-02-04 09:43:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Many more unfortunately. Actually a stable and free Iraq is how the Iranians will be destabilized more than sanctions. They will fear an uprising of there own people.

2007-02-04 09:44:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Please tell us the resolution that authorized military force. It sure as hell wasn't 1441. The UN didn't sanction the invasion yet the Bush administration continues to use UN resolutions to justify it. They can't have it both ways.

2007-02-04 09:55:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Iran has never violated any UN resolution or any element of the charter.

The real question is, how many UN violations will the US and Britain have before the world has to do something about it?

EDIT: nice link, andy g. Everyone should listen to Scott Ritter. Of course it has nothing about Iran violated any UN resolutions or the Charter.

2007-02-04 09:43:06 · answer #6 · answered by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 · 0 6

UN able
UN capable
UN tolerable
just plain UN
the UN is useless.

2007-02-04 09:42:30 · answer #7 · answered by 007 4 · 6 1

With all these loose cannons on deck, burning short fuses?

To: 007 in addition to your list...UN confirmed

2007-02-04 09:49:08 · answer #8 · answered by eks_spurt 4 · 0 1

Iran, we don't have to worry about Iran.

France is taking care of them, and there success rate of dealing with possible foreign aggressors is impeccable.

Well, they have to win one sooner or later.

2007-02-04 09:48:00 · answer #9 · answered by snowball45830 5 · 0 2

Probably fewer than Israel has.

2007-02-04 09:50:27 · answer #10 · answered by laurelandhearty 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers