Life from the perspective of a crawling child...what's at their eye level? What catches their interest? What do they see under the sofa? (spiders perhaps & lost toys). Shadows, insects, crumbs, little pieces of broken things, sockets and wires and looking up at very big, tall things we take for granted.
It'd be an interesting exercise in perspective, colour and imagination too...
My 2 penny's worth... :-)
2007-02-04 20:26:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by SEJ71 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
could be about how to create a 30 page illustrated story
2007-02-04 07:14:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
My Staffie had six puppies 9 weeks ago.
I should have illustraded their first 6 weeks, Amazing illustrated story that one.
2007-02-04 00:26:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by The Puppy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i imagine they're equivalent leaps of religion. What your humorous anecdote leaves out is time. With limitless time and ink falling in limitless varieties, who's to assert that only truly a style of varieties does no longer be a pleasing poem. With limitless tries, that is definitely a statistical reality. There has continually been questions we received't answer. the alternative we make isn't any matter if to settle for "i do not comprehend" as an perfect answer. some can attempt this and others can't. human beings evidently worry what we do not comprehend. This has brought with reference to the idea of beliefs. beliefs and worry are very effective constructs that would reason human beings to do astonishing issues. sturdy and undesirable. If human beings are given limitless time to study and study, will we no longer study an unlimited quantity of issues? although, this does no longer recommend there are not an unlimited quantity of issues to study. So, in my opinion, I take care of the question of that is the bigger infinity? The issues we may be able to study with limitless time or the limitless quantity of issues which will be realized? As we flow alongside we trust what we pick to if no evidence might want to be shown to us. yet as we comprehend extra, extra questions are raised. For the followers of any faith, some thing that does no longer seem to have reason/evidence/information to grant an evidence is attributed to a god. yet as we comprehend it extra the reason is attributed to a god. Then we comprehend that, and the clarification for the reason is attributed to a god. So what God "does" is definitely transferring alongside this continuum that follows precisely alongside the point of what can't be defined. ex. faith: God makes the daylight arise. technology: the rotating earth makes the daylight arise. faith: God makes the earth rotate. technology: Earth rotates by way of physics, faith: God makes the guidelines of physics. technology: A grand unified idea makes the guidelines of physics. faith: God makes grand unified idea, See the area right here? there is continually a continuum of the unexplained which will be attributed to a god through theists. And this unexplained will continually exist. a possibility answer "god" only as truly as announcing "IDK". so that you may want to reiterate my answer for your unique question "they're the equivalent".
2016-11-25 00:33:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
why not do the life and times of the Yahoo answers and how people are affected by it
2007-02-04 00:55:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by dottydog 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
saddams influence, hitler like? this would be easy to do and relevant to today
2007-02-04 00:20:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋