If we are distroying the world...?

Question

...in one or two generations, can go to the moon, and do all the stuff were doing, then what were people doing for the past 35 million years?

Answer 1

This is an incorrect assumption that many make.

We are not destroying the world. We are only destroying the worlds capacity to support human beings. The world will still be here before after we reach a place where we cannot live on it, and it will recover after a period of time but it is likely we will not be here, or if we are not in the numbers we are at the moment.

What we are doing, is making it difficult to support ourselves. Over fishing, means we don't have enough food from the sea. Over grazing means we cannot produce enough meat. Over fertilizing means we destroy the ability of the rest of the country side to produce.

But the world will still be here. Just possibly no humans. That is what we have to ask ourselves, do we want to still be here in a thousand years?

Answer 2

I am not sure about the question you are asking - but without saving the world, I think that a bit of grammar and synthax could help a lot in the mutual understanding of the world population..

As people say - lets start solving the problems close by!