Pakistan is more populated than Iraq.
Pakistan is more homogenous than Iraq.
Pakistan is more mountainous than Iraq.
Pakistan is better armed than Iraq was.
Pakistan is better regarded than Iraq was.
I think my answer is clear enough.
2007-02-03 21:53:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mardy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
u . s . a . has in no way been waiting to win a conflict. endure in techniques Vietnam ? And these days she became into no longer able to subdue Iraqi u . s . a ., in spite of if it became into divided in 3 sections. And Iraq had a inhabitants of 35 million. It even did no longer subdue Afghanistan it somewhat is a foul and destitute u . s . a . and has a inhabitants of under 20 million. on the choice Pakistan is a rustic of a hundred and seventy million and has nuclear weapons in her arsenal. how in the international u.s. can defeat, a rustic of a hundred and seventy million, with 1500 million Muslims of the international to back her up. additionally China won't enable u.s. to return and encircle her. final yet no longer the least is the financial subject of u . s . a .. She has overburdened herself by employing borrowing over 10 Trillion US money. If she indulges in yet another conflict, how she is going to recover from financial meltdown? Muhammad Javed Iqbal
2016-12-17 09:02:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
the 1972 Miami Dolphins could invade Pakistan alone and succeed
2007-02-03 22:31:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by BobDanzig 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
With ease. I think we have shown the invading part is a piece of cake for us. Its when we exercise that peculiar American desire to rebuild and improve that it falls apart.
We should invade, conquer and leave. Forget about rebuilding let them rebuild themselves with the clean slate we leave them.
I know this sounds bad but I'm tired of our soldiers being killed while trying to rebuild Iraq.
2007-02-03 21:59:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by whlydg 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Pakistan has got a big army with good equipment and it also has nuclear weapons. I think America would find it tough like Vietnam they would eventually lose in fact.
2007-02-03 21:50:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Truman 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think GW Bush should personally invade Pakistan. Sure there are millions of Muslims there, but he should do fine with God on his side.
2007-02-03 22:13:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Terracinese 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
No. Hopefully, USA doesn't invade any country any time soon (or ever).
2007-02-03 21:50:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by shakensunshine86 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
, No the USA would not, they have failed in Iraq ,Afghanistan,
Vietnam, Korea, The most successful of their victories was against the English.
2007-02-03 22:03:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by mickjack 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
No it wouldn't. Bad enough that they're in Iraq, and Afghanistan and threatening to bomb Iran. No they've caused too many problems already.
2007-02-04 01:00:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They have not been successful anywhere else so why should Pakistan be different. (OK maybe WWII).
2007-02-03 22:01:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by happytaffy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋