Absolutely....
All politicians lie or exaggerate to either get their point across or to get out of a tricky situation. But.... being a member of parliament it is a required trait... no spin without b*lls*it.. and this shower of no-hopers are expert at it...
And as for Tony B-liar.... from Prime Minister to Slime Minister in just a few years.... get them all out and put someone in who has half a brain and a realistic grasp on life.....
Does anyone else think that when he first came to power he had a remarkable resemblance to Frank Spencer? That should have been a warning in itself.....
Mega
2007-02-03 21:28:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by megastiff 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
ok, coming from someone who isn't a Democrat (that could be me) i am going to respond to a number of your costs. i do not shelter Saddam. What he did develop into heinous. although once you pick to get rid of the in common words SECULAR (non-muslim) chief in a area the position you're scuffling with THEOCRATIC (muslim) authorities FUNDED terrorists it variety of feels somewhat ridiculous, noticeably once you've the prospect to really end an analogous genocidal attack interior the Darfur area, the position the Sudanese administration would truly have extra to do with international terror and also you do no longer some thing. For that count, Turkish prisons are mythical for his or her torture, and yet, they're our greatest chum. At ideal, the coolest judgment is inconsistent. At worst the coolest judgment isn't even there. so a strategies as no matter if bill Clinton were given the BJ, did not get the BJ, diddled his staffer with a Macanudo, frankly, it did not do a lot to influence my existence: the in common words human being interior the international who necessary to take bill to the woodshed in this develop into Hillary Clinton or Chelsey Clinton because they had to handle the crap customary. he isn't any longer the first President to apply the oval place of work for that and he probable isn't the perfect. Threatening impeachment for that develop into borderline lunacy. you comprehend, if there develop into adequate data to instruct rape, do not you imagine He may were in penal complex now. there have been many years and under no circumstances like the pedophile monks, all of us comprehend each and each and every of the gamers and data. what's there to shelter? Whitewater = undesirable organisation deal. He lost funds. get over it. wish that clears it up for you...
2016-11-25 00:23:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ministers are mostly like prostitutes; they wil say and do whatever the current "driving force" requires from them. Many topics of crusade and "need" are chosen simply since they are hard to actually be tested upon it objectively, and even harder to be tested if they actually achieved any significant successes on dealing with these issues. The few good politicians in life occupied themselves with tangible projects, such as building schools, universities, hospitals, furthering science etc, and not rhetoric and targeting the defenseless.
2007-02-03 22:23:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by curiousgirl 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well most of them are trying to cover their own a*ses over their own blunders. Look at our Antipodean immigrant Ms.Hewitt Secretary for Health,she just admitted that the governments pay out to doctors was ' a mistake' in that they now no longer cover night or week-ends but can earn over £106,000 per annum. However she was careful to blame the doctors for practically everything that is wrong with the NHS. No wonder she was on MI5's books for years. I won't even mention John Reid !.
2007-02-04 01:00:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Rob Roy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If it's the Party line, they certainly do. Politicians now only care about keeping their job so who's going to dispute their party's policy? I used to think the Tories in the last years of their 16 year reign were pretty dire. This lot beats them all handsdown and has done for many years now. I suppose somebody voted them in, didn't they or did they just materialize whilst we were all out on a binge?
2007-02-03 21:38:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by michael w 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
OH YES they are to scared to speak the truth because there are to many do gooders in this country who are waiting like vultures to swoop when a politician "tries" to tell the truth and say what the majority of the country is thinking.
2007-02-03 21:32:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by bobpie 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes
2007-02-03 21:28:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
OHHHH YESSSSS! and by indefensible do you mean, The Rt Hon Tony B-liar MP.
2007-02-03 21:24:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The point is to tell the same lie over and over until people lose interest and their interests are safe
2007-02-03 21:32:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Northern Spriggan 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes - but there is a simple reason for that - it was their own idea in the first place.
2007-02-04 04:51:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by LongJohns 7
·
0⤊
0⤋