Labour was supposed to be the working mans choice and most cannot afford one home of their own?
2007-02-03 19:58:00 · 16 answers · asked by Jaffa1700 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Does it really matter , the next PM will be the same, whichever party wins the next election the practice of being corrupt will carry on , These so called pillars of society are just there to feather their own nests.
2007-02-03 22:33:46 · answer #1 · answered by Bob T 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tony Blair should go.
New Labour and Labour are all bore out o socialism and socailism means High Taxes, Massive govt spending to improve employment rates, expanding govt into peoples everday lives and slowly moving towards a socialist totalitarian govt, uncontrolled immigration and the disassembly o traditional British values and culture
I am working class and have never been so poor under a govt set or working class people.
Labour politications all become corrupt once they gain power. Why did the Super casino go to Manchester?? a Labour area!
Why are non Labour Borough Councils given nearly 50% less govt funding (but manage to the Job ) Than LAbour borough councils.
You people should wake up this party is a joke and has been many years.
2007-02-04 02:12:54 · answer #2 · answered by stewartandanna 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes he should go now for letting all these immigrants into this country, especially the Muslims who are fundamentalists and could put our lives at risk, like Hooky commonly called Abu Hamza, the ugly man with one eye and one hand who has been found guilty of 6 charges of soliciting to murder, and guilty of 3 charges related to stirring up racial hatred , he is wanted also in Washinton too for being a terrorist facilitor with global reach, tax payers have been paying for him to preach and course all this trouble, how long did it take the goverment to arrest such a man?
Also Blair has made a bad decision over the war, and he is quite rich enough if he has brought his fifth house. As a person I think he is quite nice, but in politics unfortunately I think it is time for him to go, but not to give the power to Gordan Brown either.
2007-02-03 22:45:57 · answer #3 · answered by mellouckili 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Has there ever been any evidence to indicate that socialist politicians in any modern society lead a frugal existance compared with their political opposites? maybe it appeared that way generations ago because the political establishment was initially dominated by the aristocracy. I for one am not a bit surprised at Blairs behaviour. He is an ambitious modern man and hardly an aesthete.
2007-02-03 20:13:36 · answer #4 · answered by fred35 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
When you can sell honours and democratic voting powers with a seat in the Lords for a cool 1 million quid, a 5th property is loose change.
It's a fact that nobody knew about those dodgy donations to Lord Levy and nobody really knows where the money went.
Funny that Blair suddenly starting buying million quid properties after selling off our democracy.
2007-02-03 20:13:41 · answer #5 · answered by Cracker 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes all politicians are greedy,self centred people. No wonder society is getting worse, with all the idiots at top setting such poor examples!. Tony will make more money when he leaves office selling books,after dinner speeches, sitting on board room companies for 15 days a year (£100,000 salary,etc). I have learnt a lot from them, all this cash for Honor's lark is no surprise, they are all criminals. It is the poor folk on 5.35 wage i feel for. No wonder their is so much crime and disrespect in general!.
2007-02-03 20:14:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Geeze. Amazing how George and Tony agree about kicking a dictator's butt, but they're from entirely different viewpoints. Tony's a socialist, and George is a liberal spender & tax conservative.. Weird, huh? They both don't seem to worry that they've commited political suicide in the bargain. They don't care about media. Or opinions. Or polls. These guys are way too much like Churchill, when, you'll all admit, we really need a Chamberlain.
Incidentally, U.S. home ownership is at an all-time high under the Bush administration. Unemployment is extremely low, economic growth is high, and goverment revenues are amazing, with lessened tax rates. If you're going to dump a courageous man like Blair, I suggest you replace him with a Thatcher.
2007-02-03 20:19:36 · answer #7 · answered by Boomer Wisdom 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Well, you only have to look at his fat pal Prescott to see how much they all change when they get a sniff of the good life. All labour do for the working man is crank up the taxes to pay for more administrators.
2007-02-03 20:04:43 · answer #8 · answered by Ahwell 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
labour IS for the working man,BUT we have a new labour govt which has nothing to do with labour blair and his cronies conned us all, but what choice did we have?the tories-i dont think so,liberals=joke basically we are caught between a rock and a hard place !!!
2007-02-03 20:12:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
he should of gone before christmas, labour used to be working class not now they are like the unions take our money and buy new houses and cars and the people who need the money get deeper in the red the country is slipping back to all for the ritch nothing for the normal hard working low paid worker
2007-02-03 20:19:38 · answer #10 · answered by Steven E 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋