Most liberals support the cut and run policy of the democratic party. How does this keep terrorism at bay. Nancy P has suggested a group hug will work in battling terrorist but I am worried that when i am hugging them they will blow the bomb up that is strapped to there chest.
2007-02-03 17:54:38 · 17 answers · asked by CG 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
liberals solution, "open a dialogue". i think that is the most nauseating phrase of the 21st century. lets see, open a dialogue with the terrorists to make sure they blow you up last!
idiots!
2007-02-03 18:02:42 · answer #1 · answered by Buk (Fey) 3 · 3⤊ 7⤋
I would say the first order of business would be to actually go after the terrorists. Bush relegates the War on Terror to second status to feed his obsession with Iraq and like blooming onions, terrorist cells are springing up all over the world. The answers? If I had those I'D be running for President but I do have a couple of ideas. A good place to start would be a world conference with all of our Allies that addresses how we can best work together for all of our safety. This should include increased and more readily shared intelligence with serious, well thought out guidelines to ensure we communicate and act with all due speed and force to any attacks, or planned attacks. Let's call it the Allied Forces Against Terrorism. The military then needs to develop a new branch that does nothing but deal with terrorists - men and women not meant for a ground war such as Iraq, but to be ready to deploy and protect all over the world on very short notice. They should be closely tied to and operate, along with our Allies' militaries, with the newly formed AFAT.
I guess my point is (clearly I'm not a military tactician) that if we, as a country, wish to defeat terrorism, we need to form a closer bond with other countries in the world, and address this from a world perspective and not just an American one. WWII wasn't won simply because the Americans entered it. It was won through amazing collaboration among the Allies. Is there some particular reason, besides our current cowboy attitude, that prevents this from being a good tactic to take once again?
2007-02-04 02:47:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
How about closing the Mexican boarders. If illegals can sneak across then terrorist can too. Allow no one to come over the boarder. Then make sure that government sites aren't sold to private business. Ensure the places that had high security clearance remain that way don't sell American ports to middle east interests. IF someone who is Muslim is interested in coming to the united states makes sure a complete background check is done. Some people might say that's racist. However let's face it Al Quaeda is Muslim not Jewish, or Catholic, or protestant! Even will all these thing in tact isn't still not a guarantee that we won't get hit again but it's a start!
2007-02-04 03:22:29 · answer #3 · answered by wondermom 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why do you right wingers always use "cut and run" as a way to describe dissent? Republicans still haven't figured out that terrorism is a tactic and not a person. They insist on staying in Iraq instead of going after terrorists. You want to fight terrorists.. then go after them. Don't fight the war on their terms. repubicans have had enough time to get this job done and bush has failed from the very beginning.
Iraq is a classic wag the dog. No success in Afghanistan, so lets divert attention to Iraq. Really stupid when you consider that Iran has been the bad guy all alog.
2007-02-04 02:02:57 · answer #4 · answered by David L 6 · 5⤊ 4⤋
most Liberals do not propose "cut and run"...but the President has no idea how to win or even break even. the Left is a legitimate part of the intellectual power of the US and it has been ignored...we just want logical thought to be put toward the might and money of the US, Iraq is here to stay for a while no matter who is in charge, but the Right has misused their power and are paying for it by not being re-elected...Liberals hate terrorists as much as you do, but believe the answers are partly at home in the defense of our borders and the creation of an independent energy supply...questions like these are worthless to the problems facing us...get on the bus or be left in the dust..
The most amazing thing I've seen on Yahoo is the women who are pro-war and would not have to serve unless they volunteered and speak for millions of young men that would have to serve if US policies require it...A woman who is pro "blow them all up" is wierd to me...the reason I am for a logical and sane foreign policy is because of my 15 year old son...who are these women and do they have sons or are they Ann Coulter clones?
2007-02-04 02:02:41 · answer #5 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
How about the U.S. stop spending tons on training the Iraqi military? Obviously nobody in congress, or President Bush, paid attention in history class. How did the Al Qaeda get the weapons, training, and all the necessities for terrorism? Yes, that's right, the U.S. had given them the power. Furthermore, looking at 9/11- how were the hijackers trained? At American flight schools! How was Bin Laden trained? American Universities! Is there a pattern here?
So, does training a bunch of middle easterners how to fight like the US, give them U.S. weapons, and become friends with them not sound like a mistake? One would think so.
2007-02-04 02:07:10 · answer #6 · answered by jeffknavy 2 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Everything starts with "stop bombing their cities and towns, killing innocent women, children, and old people." From the sound of your question, if someone bombed the town you lived in, you would be one of the first to volunteer to fight back. Once you start there, much more is possible. As long as the bombing goes on, there will only be more "terrorists" every day.
2007-02-04 02:10:31 · answer #7 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
The truth is, many liberals did have the answer to fighting terrorism. They voted to go to war. Clinton, Schumer, Edwards and Kerry to name a few.
Problem is, they realized there were a lot of votes to be gained by changing their minds. So they did.
Isn't it funny how the libs don't hold their own candidates feet to the fire?
2007-02-04 02:25:58 · answer #8 · answered by djz802 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
They think we should meet all the demands of the radical Muslims and give up. They had an imam give the prayer at the democrat winter meetings.
2007-02-04 02:14:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
we need to stop being politically correct and start being factually correct. Once we stop lying and saying Islam is a religion of peace and confront muslims with the hideous teachings thats in the Quran terrorism will be brought down.
2007-02-04 02:04:02 · answer #10 · answered by I-Ponder 2 · 3⤊ 5⤋
get the hell out of Iraq, there were no fooking terrorists there that were a danger to us. Other than that if they are after us, hunt them down and kill 'em. Start with Bin Laden.
2007-02-04 01:59:21 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋