2007-02-03 15:47:18 · 16 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
what is that you are asking is that is not known to me.
2007-02-04 17:41:51 · answer #1 · answered by nightingale 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Whether there is philosophical connotation/explanation parallel to this or not (which is most likely there has to be), I am going to discuss my opinion derived from my own idea.
The way i comprehend the question it will logically mean possibly this way:
"The differences distinguishing 'me' is as equivalent to the differences distinguishing 'I am'. The object of the predicate 'me' is superseded by the object 'I am' due to the fact that 'I am' recalls a heavier impact.a collective being, the whole of being me.
On the other hand, psychologically it would mean:
"What I am is the outcome of plus factors and negative factors in me"
This in a sense can be explained further by character traits that make 'I am' . Negative traits represent 'I am's' weaknesses, and positive traits will then represent 'I am's' strengths. 'I am's' equivalence underlies the ratio and proportion of his/her plus factors and negative factors. But in order to be distinguished, the better good must prevail over something bad. We then try to eliminate/take away/subtract negative factors from plus factors. In so doing will bring forth difference(s) attributable to/will distinguish 'I am'. It would then be fair to logically say 'I am the differences distinguishing me'.
But then as importantly is the superficial but relevant usage of the word 'distinguishing'. It is in its present participle form but it could mean otherwise 'distinguish' which points out technically the meaning: to identify from,recognize from, or elaborate from (other things, people, events etc)
But in your question I am simply convinced that the usage of the word 'distinguishing' is in its adjective form(distinguished) meaning achievements, notable distinction, awards but not limited to. In which case, such differences would only pertain to you in the person of 'I am'.
2007-02-10 15:24:26 · answer #2 · answered by oscar c 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe you are asking are you equal to the things that distinguish you from other people?
I would say no, you are greater than just those characteristics that distinguish you. You are also made up of characteristics that make you similar to other people. It is not a bad thing to have similarities with other people. It makes us able to share feelings and experiences, and it helps us to understand one other.
We are all similar in that we are all living beings living together in this universe. This similarity should act as a catalyst for unity and peace.
Indeed a person is equal to the sum of their similarities as well as their differences to other people.
2007-02-10 19:08:22 · answer #3 · answered by ignoramus_the_great 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wrong. The differences distinguishing you are on a different logical level then you and in that are a part of you but not equivalence to you.
The differences distinguishing you are on a lower logical level then you and they are not on the same this means lateral level then you as a being.
2007-02-04 00:27:27 · answer #4 · answered by I love you too! 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
In the world of duality any thing that can be imagined will automatically get the opposite of that thing born at the same instant, thus If something has equivalence to the differences then it can be only the true self in different modes.
2007-02-04 06:42:13 · answer #5 · answered by mr.kotiankar 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
equivalence is rectified by the utilization of differences held within the parastructure of the parallel infrastructure that bisects and bilinguates the transection of the hypothetical trigonomy of the mesoshepere.
thus, this distinguishes the heterotransition and homogenization of lactation bifurcation of seminalism.
hopefully, i didnt insult you by simplifying my answer too much!
2007-02-03 23:57:34 · answer #6 · answered by jkk k 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I take you to mean that everyone is who they uniquely are for everyone is different from one another. It is your differences and imperfections that makes "you" separate and apart from everyone else. No one else can be exactly like you. Not even your twin.
2007-02-08 22:31:08 · answer #7 · answered by Uncle Remus 54 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Again you are using English words that really don't; make sense to those of us who speak the language.
Maybe ask this way........
What is it in me that makes me, me? and Why?
2007-02-06 00:23:33 · answer #8 · answered by clcalifornia 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i am the changing of the guard.
i am british airways.
you are Popeye
i yam what i yam.
ego sum qui sum
is the question why are you so pompous?
2007-02-11 08:10:44 · answer #9 · answered by the council of golden retrievers 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I really want to answer your question. Which is weird, because I have no idea what you are asking.
2007-02-03 23:57:03 · answer #10 · answered by Geaux-Geaux Girl 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am I,
the Many and the One.
You,too.
2007-02-10 23:16:33 · answer #11 · answered by Croa 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋