English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I dunno who to choose nash or dirk i think nash but im not sure

2007-02-03 14:16:26 · 11 answers · asked by punjabi4life 4 in Sports Basketball

11 answers

I think the Mavs are better. Both have good offenses, Suns have a slighter edge in that department, but at least the Mavs have a defense. Plus, the Mavs have NBA Finals experience. They have a slight edge over the Suns but both are definately the top 2 teams in the NBA.

As for the Nash/Dirk question, it's like comparing apples to oranges. One plays post, one is a guard. One is around 6 feet tall, the other is around 7 feet tall. One is German, one is Canadian. Actually, that last one doesn't matter but..you get the point. It's hard to compare them, but to who is more valuable to his team, Nash is more valuable because I don't think Barbosa is that good and the Mavs would still be a top 5 without Dirk because they still would have Josh Howard, Devin Harris, Jerry Stackhouse, Jason Terry, and Devean George.

2007-02-03 14:31:04 · answer #1 · answered by Hank 5 · 0 0

I think the mavericks are the better team and I think Dirk is better. The only other major help on Dirk's team is Josh Howard. Nash has Shawn Marion and Amare Stouamire, which means that Dirk is the better player.

2007-02-03 14:21:14 · answer #2 · answered by wink91wink 2 · 0 0

Mavs and Dirk....

Dirk is a better all around player, Nash gets help from having all star team mates (Marion and Stoudemire) unlike Dirk

2007-02-03 16:05:32 · answer #3 · answered by funky munky 2 · 0 0

well im a suns fan but the standings say everything there a game better but nash and dirk used to play together woo wee they were dangerous but i think nash is better

2007-02-03 14:45:14 · answer #4 · answered by frank w 1 · 0 0

i say the suns r better but dirk is a better player then nash

2007-02-03 14:24:25 · answer #5 · answered by The Man 3 · 0 0

i would say that the mavs are a better team. and you cant really compare dirk and steve because they play different roles. steve is better than dirk in being a point guard and dirk is better than steve at being a forward. now if you ask who is more valuable to the team, i would say steve because he is a great passer and gets his team involved

2007-02-03 14:28:30 · answer #6 · answered by quik1804 2 · 0 0

The Suns, Nash is better!

He is a team player and controls the tempo of a game.

The Suns are so good when they run fast!

2007-02-03 14:19:37 · answer #7 · answered by traderb550 3 · 0 0

i have self assurance that Christiano is a better effective all round participant. The data are he's a better effective participant for authentic Madrid than Ronaldo grow to be. regardless of the indisputable fact that at the same time as comparing gamers from the previous to the fashionable era i will not help yet imagine it grow to be harder for forwards again then. Why? properly because the tackles the position harder and also you got away with way better as a defender. also in spite of the communities both performed in for his or her international places the Brazilian unmarried handily gained them video games at cases and he gained them international cups. both are magnificent gamers yet for now I supply the sting to the Brazilian. Christiano nonetheless has time to regulate evaluations regardless of the reality that.

2016-12-03 10:25:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the mavericks and definatley dirk because he is a team player

2007-02-03 14:50:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I love Dirk!!!

2007-02-03 14:24:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers