Ok, the biggest criticism of Donald Rumsfeld was his military plan for Iraq...
Rumsfeld believed in using less troops in Iraq, and more technology (airstrikes, tanks, machine guided airplanes, etc.)...
And essentially, according to the democrats.. at the time, we were slowly winning/failing in taking over key parts of Iraq.
The democrats were not happy with that, so they forced him to resign, essentially.
And now, the Democrats are saying that we need to lower/relinquish our troops in Iraq....
I mean, before they were unhappy with America's success in Iraq because of the limited number of troops/funding Rumsfeld sent..
and now they want to end the number of troops/funding sent to Iraq...
Would that mean you LIKE Rumsfeld? Or is there something more to it? Was Congress afraid of Rumsfeld because he was doing exactly what the Democrats wanted (lowering funding/troops), and showing exactly how much of a failure it was?
2007-02-03
14:15:02
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Corey
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
also, why did the Democrats get so uptight and defensive when President Bush or the media talked about Rumsfeld?
Were they afraid that people would realise that what Rumsfeld was doing was failing... and what the Democrats were planning on doing was exactly wat Rumsfeld was doing, before he resigned?
2007-02-03
14:17:36 ·
update #1