2007-02-03 12:50:08 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Baseball
In the AL, I think Boston and Minnesota will be the two best teams. I think Toronto could be a darkhorse. In the NL, I think St. Louis, Houston and the Muts will be up at the top. Probably another Boston-St. Louis World series.
2007-02-03 13:04:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
You know the Yankees aren't going to disappoint. You can never count them out of a pennant race. The Red Sox are reloading this offseason too. They look pretty strong. Don't forget about some teams outside of the East, though. The Angels don't look too shabby. The White Sox and Twins can also compete with the best teams, too.
My AL prediction: Yankees
In the National League, you have the Mets who almost got to the Series last season. The Giants are just about finished rebuilding, and I think they can get pretty far in the playoffs. You can't forget the Cardinals, the reigning World Champions or the Braves who are looking to reclaim the NL East title.
My NL prediction: Mets
A subway series rematch! How about that? This coming from an impartial onlooker.
2007-02-07 16:55:28 · answer #2 · answered by ashkadoodles12345 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like an All Chicago Series. The White Sox improved the pen and the Cubs on paper are the best team in the NL which is weak and can be won as evident with the Cards.
2007-02-03 21:42:08 · answer #3 · answered by Help 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Braves vs Tigers
The Braves have a revamped pitching. I just get the feeling with Hampton coming back that Smoltz, Hampton and Hudson could have a year rivaling Maddux, Glavine and Smoltz. They also have the strongest pen in the MLB with Wickman, Soriano, and Gonzalez. Pitching wins the world series, the Braves will comeback.
The Tigers also will win because of their solid pitching. Offense can only carry a team so far, but pitching, pitching wins championships. If you have good defense and pitching, you can't lose, because you won't give up runs.
2007-02-07 20:40:27 · answer #4 · answered by brettkettyle13 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say the Cubs in the NL, but they will NEVER win a World Series ever again. I don't know why I said "ever again", it's been a hundred years, but I mean it will be the year 5000, and they still wouldn't have won a World Series. I would like to see a Sox-Cubs World Series, but that won't happen. Well, 50% of that will happen.
I think it will be the Chicago White Sox vs. the Los Angeles Dodgers. You heard it here first!
2007-02-03 21:45:20 · answer #5 · answered by Hank 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
People who expect great things from the cubs are going to be very disappointed. What is going to make them so great? Soriano? Please give me a break. Even if things go well and they gel within one season, the sheer pressure of going to the playoffs would scare half their team into having an injury, and then they would right back where they were this season. The A.L. will send either the Yanks or the Tigers, again, and the N.L. will be a race between the Braves and the Amazins. Bank on it my friends, bank on it. Or jump on the bandwagon destined for disappointment.
2007-02-04 04:32:17 · answer #6 · answered by jerbaby2002 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
it might come down to the 2 teams again the Yankees and the soxs but since I'm a Yankee fan u will probably see them win so now that's done u will see the yanks and the dodgers in the world series.
2007-02-06 15:32:46 · answer #7 · answered by skip k 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the last time I checked there are 30 teams fighting for the prize but it does come down to two.NL-Cardinals repeat as NL champions
AL-Tigers repeat as AL Champions
And the Winner is The Birds on the Bat
Back to back Baby O'Yea
2007-02-04 15:37:30 · answer #8 · answered by Ricky Lee 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
St. Louis will win the central cuz the cubs will nvr win and Cards will go to the Series and play the Yankees a classic world series matchup
2007-02-03 22:46:29 · answer #9 · answered by ftballplyr 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It will be a re-play of the 1907 World Series.
Only this time The Tigers beat The Cubs.
Please...anyone who thinks the whinny sux even have a remote chance must not know that 2005 was a fluke for them.
2007-02-03 21:42:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋