Great idea. Football is supposed to be played in bad weather.
I also don't like the idea that the Super Bowl is always played at a neutral site. Fans spend lots of money and lots of years supporting their home teams and then when the big game finally comes they are shut out of it.
I think that the conference that wins the Super Bowl should have the next years Super Bowl played at the home field of that conferences representative.
BTW Manning fans :Miami is supposed to have 18mph winds with gusts up tp 25+mph & 50% chance of rain at game time.
2007-02-03 12:07:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It would be awesome...but the major issue is that there aren't enough hotels apparently for all of the fans going to the game or just to be around the atmosphere of the Super Bowl. We'll see if the committee that makes the decision will ever pick it. I think the New York one will show how cold weather super bowls will be in the future.
2016-05-24 00:45:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it should be in all kinds of climate just as the games are played during the regular season. It was done for many years before the super bowl. It needs to be moved around the country to give different cities a chance at a financial bonanza.
2007-02-03 11:48:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by DaKnights 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd laugh my nuts off. I guess Green Bay has to find some way of going to the big show. It's been like homefield for Da Bears the past few years and the lousy weather just gives another advantage.
2007-02-03 11:54:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by destroydapacka 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wwll if you asking it because it's so cold up there I would feel good about it.The teams shouldn't have the games down south or in a dome all the time.They should try it in Green Bay or Chicago.And if your asking it because you think Bears fans would hate it,the Bears players might suffer a few concusions from flying beer bottles.
2007-02-03 14:19:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by red4tribe 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Never gonna happen. In cold weather cities the game has to be played in a dome and I just don't see that happening. Who is going to lay out $2,500 a ticket to sit outside in Green Bay in February. Only sturgeon spear fishermen I guess.
2007-02-03 12:02:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by texaseddyinflorida 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it would be great to sit home and watch it on TV. But if I paid thousands of dollars for a ticket, I wouldn't want to sit in below zero weather for 4 hours!
2007-02-03 11:51:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by crazydave 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sorry, It's not a Superbowl City!
It will never happen, there are really only 3 good superbowl towns:
Miami, San Diego and Phoenix!
Weather !
2007-02-03 15:20:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by traderb550 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Although it will never happen I would love to see it I get tired of seeing games in domes all the time
2007-02-03 11:46:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Two words.
Manic Depression
2007-02-03 12:07:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Kevin 3
·
0⤊
0⤋