How will it effect the US in 2008
2007-02-03 10:54:19 · 18 answers · asked by good4u06@verizon.net 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The prospect of her as President is frightening.
But with the media giving her soft fly balls to field instead of grilling her on her checkered past, including larceny and mail fraud regarding Whitewater they are obviously working as hard to make her President as they worked to scuttle the Republicans last November.
Her comment about "taking oil companies' profits" and using them for alternate fuel proves her socialist redistribution of wealth plans are reality, not GOP fearmongering. That statement also displays her lack of knowledge of free enterprise and and earnest desire to destroy the economy.
The prospects for the future of the economy and of the continued growth of individual wealth is grim as she is a neo-liberal who wants to spread her socialist ideals around. Look atHugo Chavez in Venezuela and how he is nationalizing his country. That is what she wants to do. The USSR and Cuba went bankrupt because Marxism and nationalization of industry harms an economy, it doesn't help.
2007-02-03 11:12:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Oh my God, NO... Sarah Palin would not be allowed to face on that level and run because the vice chairman of this united states of america if women human beings like Hillary Clinton (and different modern women human beings in the previous her) hadn't prepared the floor. That woman has NO journey and is operating fullyyt a platform of aggression and conservative values (which have not served her kinfolk nicely hence some distance). This united states of america is headed down a risky direction if that woman is authorized into Washington!!
2016-11-02 06:00:55 · answer #2 · answered by arrocha 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's a wonderful thing that she is running, I was hoping she would. I believe in Hillary Clinton and think she will make an excellent President. It will affect us positively - and people in this country are dying to return to a period of positivity. She's brilliant, well versed in foreign affairs, and I like her stand on most of the issues - more than any other candidate to date. I'm hoping, and so are a lot of other people, that it will be a Clinton/Obama ticket. That combination may be unbeatable in 2008, though we've a long way to go.
2007-02-03 11:27:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't know her personally; and as far as I know, she can run a marathon as well as run a campaign for the Presidency; I don't know!
HOWEVER, IF she's the best qualified candidate, she will certainly get my vote. She's proving that she's a very knowledgeable and savvy person, and that's always a plus in her favor. I have no issues with sexism (I drool when it comes to intelligent women and get turned off by dumb broads and dumb bimbos)
It looks like there's not much competition right now. She's a pretty smart person and is certainly getting the attention of many who formally voted for Dubya, and are discouraged with the antics of the Republican Party.
IF she shows herself to be the most competent candidate (she's certainly smarter than Bush; I would have loved to see HER debating him on ANYTHING), she should be seriously considered.
The candidate's gender or race or religion should not factor into his/her qualifications. But, of course, there are those who would do or say anything to keep women out of a position of power (even though they are the most qualified) or keep a Black man out of a position of power (even though he may be the most qualified).
Right now, Mr. Obama is squeaky clean insofar as his moral standing and his ethics are concerned, not like many of the "good ol' boys" in the Republican Party; and Mrs. Clinton has shown herself to be a fighter for what she feels is right, and she is not afraid to say, "I made a mistake by believing President Bush," which is more than anyone else DARES to say in public.
EDITED: Whitewater was nothing more than a fishing expedition by Republicans that turned into a witchhunt, and after about $50-$70 millions of wasted dollars to investigate, NOTHING was ever proven except that the Republicans couldn't smear her or her husband, and they merely made themselves to look stupid and foolish in the eyes of the public. So, wassup with that nonsense? Jesi, sorry to burst your bubble, but here in America, people are presumed innocent until proven guilty, NOT guilty by accusation; just remember that ANYONE can be accused by an enemy, especially in politics and the Republicans are well-known for their dirty tactics!
2007-02-03 11:26:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's time for change. I believe the election of Hillary Rodham Clinton, as president, will pave the way for advances in American integrity, ingenuity, and promise. America must heal before it can move forward. It can only achieve this goal with a Democrat as president. We must undergo many changes to reclaim our rightful place, as an authentic leader, in the world.
2007-02-03 11:10:58 · answer #5 · answered by Jackson Leslie 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Looking forward to her pulling a Dean and imploding. She has claimed she will end the war as soon as she takes office but not how. Perhaps she will just surrender like her pals the French like to do. Surrender is Willie's favorite word to use on those white house interns. Perhaps He taught Hillary about it.
2007-02-03 11:00:07 · answer #6 · answered by mr conservative 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
It will depend on if she wins or not. Every President affects the US.
It would have to be a pretty bad Republican choice before I'd vote for her, though. Bill in the White House once was quite enough.
2007-02-03 11:01:55 · answer #7 · answered by DAR 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Hitler was a good candidate in Germany in the early and mid 30's, if he would have died before 1938, he would have went down as one of the greatest statemen in German history, but God help us if his daughter is elected president here, unlike her father , she has a very bad temper and will not take as long to start a world war as her father did, other than that i guess she is alright
2007-02-03 11:06:16 · answer #8 · answered by DukeofDixie 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Hitler or Hillary is the only way i would vote for her she ran the white house for 8 yrs while her hubby was chasing tail and see what happened then the first world trade center attack the Cole black hawk down and the embassies in Africa no way would i ever vote for her or any other lib
2007-02-03 11:09:52 · answer #9 · answered by gus1023 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Would she do a better Job than BUSH, Is it time for a lady at the wheel, would she increase funding for medical?
Heck if Bush can win than she does have a chance.
2007-02-03 11:02:47 · answer #10 · answered by Aussie1 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋