2007-02-03 10:19:40 · 9 answers · asked by Rachel T. 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
He wouldn't have invaded. And, would anyone accept George W.? I hope not. What a horrible thing to happen to our country.
2007-02-03 10:22:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
We have the Bay of Pigs and his escalation in Vietnam to go by. It is doubtful he would of gone into Iraq. He would likely have used a proxy army to fight any war there.
2007-02-03 18:31:42 · answer #2 · answered by Billy Dee 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
JFK would not have lied to the American people and Congress to get us into a war in the first place.
2007-02-03 18:33:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Just like he handled the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba..
He cut and ran...
Perhaps like Clinton or Carter, he would have fired a few
missles into the middle of nowhere but thats about it...
2007-02-03 18:28:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
With the force and determination to win. He would have made Veit-Nam war short and we would have won, but he was assassinated. Then came Johnson and the country went to hell, instead.
2007-02-03 18:26:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
probably by waiting until they teamed up with iran, and iran started moving nuclear missles into iraq. then he would take pictures of the missles and send out some warships to stop the countries from doing anything.
but this time it wouldn't work and we'd all die.
2007-02-03 18:23:19 · answer #6 · answered by Sgt. Pepper 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
prolly the smae way he started the vietnam war
2007-02-03 20:02:18 · answer #7 · answered by cav 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
yes much better than bush
2007-02-03 18:28:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Umm who would know. Does it matter?
2007-02-03 18:26:55 · answer #9 · answered by Cherry R 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋