choose?
2007-02-03 09:21:17 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Defiantly John Prescott, for being ugly, dirty and smelly, not that I have ever smelt him, but he just looks sweaty and he is a womaniser and yet he looks terrible. It is funny that all the ugly MPs like Robin Cook that was, looked like a garden nome, and David Blankett who is as blind as a bat, and yet all these uglies man, have to have attractive women by their side, even in the case of David Blankett, he can't see how attractive Kimberly Quinn is. Tony Blair is far more physically attractive than all of these ugly MPs, but he is much more faithful. So I want to throw rotten tomatoes at John Prescott for being an ugly, dirty, old man, and for loosing his temper publicly once.
2007-02-04 03:56:19 · answer #1 · answered by mellouckili 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blair. Prescott would split the stocks, chase after me, then return to the scene, pick up the tomatoes, combine them with the famous egg, and make a decent omelette.
Mr Prescott has got guts, capability and presence - poor boy made good - and he is honest about it. Blair took a Socialist party and inverted it. As an ex-member of the labour Party, I'd vote Prescott for leader any time.
2007-02-03 09:32:01 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
properly... Tony Blair is going to grant up he's basically being an finished and utter fool, and not in any respect telling us at the same time as. Prescott ought to resign- i suggestions an affair and a amassing with a wealthy person to talk the "Milennium dome" at the instantaneous are not basically minor blemeshes on the governements list and his C.V. no count if he will or not is yet another tale. he's a former boxer, and ought to extremely strive against his nook in this one!
2016-12-03 10:06:29 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
John, he's more in the driving seat than the PM, but also not in the position where he has to front everything.
Though I would closely follow the rotten tomatoes at JP by rotten eggs at TB.
2007-02-03 09:26:54 · answer #4 · answered by bengimog 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't waste rotten tomatoes on either of them... I would compost them (and the tomatoes)!
2007-02-03 09:52:34 · answer #5 · answered by Michael B 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why use rotten tomatoes , when there are plenty of bricks
2007-02-03 10:01:06 · answer #6 · answered by greg a 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would have to go with Bliar.Prescott is useless and hasn't done anything for years whereas Bliar has done a great deal of harm to the country
2007-02-03 09:28:32 · answer #7 · answered by rosbif 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Neither, I would prefer to pelt George Galloway.
2007-02-03 09:27:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Blair as he's done the most harm to the world.
2007-02-03 15:24:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Prescott, remember when he had an egg thrown at him that was hilarious.
2007-02-03 09:25:13 · answer #10 · answered by garlicjnr2001 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋