English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-03 09:21:06 · 17 answers · asked by Ig 1 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

17 answers

How do we all learn to live together peaceably ?Through practicing this kind of Unconditional
Love toward ALL Human Beings !
Please Patiently read below. Thank You.
And Have a Great Week. Optimism is the Way.

“Love vs. Attachment”

What in the world is the difference between loving a person and being attached to them ?
Love is the sincere wish for others to be happy, and to be free from suffering.
Having realistically recognized others' kindness as well as their faults, love is always focused on the other persons welfare. We have No ulterior motives to fulfull our self-interest, or to fulfill our desires; to love others simply because they exist.
Attachment, on the other hand, exaggertes others' good qualitities and makes us crave to be with them. When we're with them, we're happy, but when we're separated from them, we are often miserable. Attachment is linked with expectations of what others should be or do.
Is love as it is usually understood in our society
really love ? or attachment ? or even possibly for some, only lust.
Let us examine this a bit more. Generally we are attracted to people either because they have qualities we value or because they help us in some way. If we observe our own thought processes mindfully, and carefully - we'll notice that we look for specific qualities in others.
Some of these qualities we find attractive, others are those our parents, or society value.
We examine someone's looks, body, education,
financial situation, social status. This is how most of us decide on whether or not the person holds any true value to us.
In addition, we judge people as worthwhile according to how they relate to us. If they help us, praise us, make us feel secure, listen to what we have to say, care for us when we are sick or depressed, we consider them good people, and it is this type of people we are most likely to be more attracted to.

But this is very biased, for we judge them only in terms of how they relate to "us", as if we are the most important person in the world.
After we've judged certain people to be good for us, whenever we see them it appears to us as if goodness is coming from them, but if we are more aware, we recognize that we have projected this goodness onto them.

Desiring to be with the people alot who make us feel good, we become emotional yo-yo's -
when we're with these people, we're Up, when we're not with these people, we're Down.

Furthermore, we form fixed concepts of what our relationships with those people will be and thus have expectations of them. When they do not live up to our expectations of them, we're very disappointed, or may become angry !
We want them to change so that they will they will match what we think they are. But our projections and expectations come from our own minds, not from the other people.
Our problems arise not because others aren't
who we thought they we're, but because we mistakenly thought they were something they
aren't.
Checklist: "I Love You if __________ "
What we call love is most often attachment.
It is actually a disturbing attitude that overestamates the qualities of another person.
We then cling to tightly to that person, thinking our happiness depends on that person.
"Love, on the other hand, is an open and very calm, relaxed attitude. We want someone to be happy, and free from suffering simply because they exist. While attachment is uncontrolled and much too sentimental, Love is direct and powerful. Attachment obscures our judgment and we become impatient, angry, and impartial, helping only our dear one's and harming those who we don't like. Love builds up others, and clarifies our minds, and we
access a situation by thinking of the greatest good for everyone. Attachment is based on
selfishness, while Love is founded upon cherishing others, even those who do not look very appealing to the eyes. Love looks beyond
all the superficial appearences, and dwells on the fact that they are just like us: they want inner peace, happiness, and want to avoid suffering. If we see unattractive, dirty, ignorant people, we feel repulsed because our selfish minds watn to know attractive, intellectual, clean, and talented people. Love, on the other hand, never evaluates others by these superficial standards and looks much deeper into the person. Love recognizes that regardless of the others' appearances, their experience is the same as ours: they seek inner peace, to be happy, to be free from sufferings, and to do their best to avoid problems.
When we're attached, we're not mentally and emotionally free. We overly depend on and cling to another person to fulfill our mental and especially our emotional needs. We fear losing the person, feeling we'd be incomplete without him.
This does not mean that we should suppress our emotional needs or become aloof, alone and totally independent, for that too does not solve the problem. We must simply realize our unrealistic needs, and slowly seek to eliminate them. Some emotional needs may be so strong that they can't be dissolved immediately.
If we try to suppress them or pretend they do not exist, we become anxious, insecure, falling into a depression. In this case, we can do our best to fulfill our needs while simultaneously working gradually to subdue them.
"The core problem is we seek to be loved, rather than to love. We yearn to be understood by others rather than to understand them. In all honesty, our sense of emotional insecurities comes from the selfishness obscuring our own
minds. 'We can develop self-confidence by recognizing our inner potential to become a selfless human being with many, many magnificient qualities, then we'll develop a true and accurate feeling of self-confidence. And
then we'll seek to increase true love, without attachments, to increase compassion, to cultivate patience and understanding, as well as generousity, concentration and wisdom.'

'Under the influence of attachment we're bound by our emotional reactions to others. When they are nice to us, we're happy. When they ignore us, or speak sharply to us, we take it personally and are unhappy. But pasifying attachment doesn't mean we become hard-hearted. Rather, without attachment there will be space in our hearts and minds for genuine Affection and Impartial Love for them.
We'll be actively involved with them.
If we learn to subdue our attachments, we can most definately have successful friendships and personal relationships with others !! These relationships will be richer because of the freedom and respect - the relationships will be based on. We'll care about the happiness and the misery of all human beings equally, simply because everyone is the same in wanting and needing inner peace, happiness, and not wanting to suffer. However, our lifestyles and interests may be more compatible with those of some people more so than with others, and that is alright. In any case, our relationships will be based on mutual Love, mutual interests, and the wish to help each other in life.

2007-02-04 13:47:23 · answer #1 · answered by Thomas 6 · 0 0

The best way is to stop teaching and believing the theory of evolution is fact and the sole originator of our existence. There is no reason to love or forgive or co-exist peacefully in evolution because the mandate is putting ones self (or kind) first to survive. If we would embrace the Truth found in the Bible and realize that a loving Creator God created us and gave us the capacity to love each other, then we will learn to live together in peace.

2007-02-03 11:06:17 · answer #2 · answered by Blessed 5 · 0 1

Great recommendation by one who was indeed concerned with true peace for the world

*** gh chap. 4 p. 30 A Practical Guide to True Happiness ***
A BOOK THAT SOLVES PROBLEMS

2 The Bible can be of tremendous practical value to us. Many thinking persons have acknowledged this fact. As an example, there is the following report in "Treasury of the Christian Faith" by S. J. Corey concerning a conversation between the Hindu leader Mahatma Gandhi and the former British Viceroy of India, Lord Irwin:

“Lord Irwin paid a visit to the Mahatma in his ashram. During the conversation Lord Irwin put this question to his host: ‘Mahatma, as man to man, tell me what you consider to be the solution to the problems of your country and mine.’ Taking up a little book from the nearby lampstand, Gandhi opened it to the fifth chapter of Matthew and replied, ‘When your country and mine shall get together on the teachings laid down by Christ in this Sermon on the Mount, we shall have solved the problems not only of our countries but those of the whole world.’ That from a Hindu!”

All this without deliberate acts of hypocrisy especially from the so called Christians--could indeed make a big difference in the world.

2007-02-03 10:33:08 · answer #3 · answered by THA 5 · 0 1

A) Stop living a "me first" and "selfish" life;
B) Include forgiveness in daily life;
C) Be tolerant of the differences of others;
D) Learn that there is NO LAW stating that you HAVE TO get in someone's face when something happens that you might not like.
E) Learn that JUST WALK AWAY can be a response.

2007-02-08 09:03:30 · answer #4 · answered by donkey hotay 3 · 0 0

There can only be peace in absolute abundance. In a world of scarcity, peace is only available to those who are willing to let go what they hold dear to them, so that others may benefit. That may be land, food, money, a person...

I don't know of any way that everybody int he world could unilaterally and unconditionally agree to make sacrifices for their neighbors- but that would be the way : )

2007-02-03 09:37:36 · answer #5 · answered by Chris 2 · 0 1

appreciate for and progression of human existence require peace. Peace isn't in common terms the absence of conflict, and it isn't constrained to keeping a stability of powers between adversaries. Peace can't be attained on earth without safeguarding the products of persons, loose verbal change between men, appreciate for the respect of persons and peoples, and the assiduous prepare of fraternity. Peace is "the tranquillity of order." Peace is the artwork of justice and the outcome of charity.

2016-11-24 21:36:45 · answer #6 · answered by zagel 4 · 0 0

we cant be taught to do anything that is impossible by nature to do

IE growing wings and flying

look at animals IN the wild -you don't see impalas trying to get along with cheetahs because they have a known habit of preying on them for food they except it because it is natural to disagree with others everyone is different it would take each individual to actually want peace..that is never going to happen because some people have evil within themselves

2007-02-03 09:29:32 · answer #7 · answered by Missbribri 5 · 0 1

You want a start? Start by helping the people around you. Do a little kindness here and there. Hopefully it'll spread. If you want the world to become better...start with yourselves.

2007-02-08 16:53:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

it would be nice to live togeather in a world of peace but it will never happen for that to happen every one on earth would have to be laid back and not worry about any thing or every one would have to be the exact same, same emotions ,same actions ,same evry thing

2007-02-03 09:33:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Conflict is an inherent part of humanity. It has been always like that and will always be. What we need to learn is to handle it. But that's tough.

2007-02-03 10:05:35 · answer #10 · answered by elasceta_777 2 · 0 1

It sounds beautiful; however, with the differences in human nature...want what we don't have, trying harder than others, wanting to be better, just trying to find a 'mate'...impossible!

2007-02-03 09:26:44 · answer #11 · answered by avechm 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers