If it is unification, then we probably need to help them find a strong ruthless dictator to hold things together. Where is Saddam when you need him now?
If the goal is breaking apart the country of Iraq, then it can be accomplished by stirring things up until so many factions are warring against each other so violently that we can only withdraw and watch things fall apart. Well, if you look at our actions rather than listen to our words, then this must be our goal.
2007-02-03 06:34:59 · 10 answers · asked by Zelda Hunter 7 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Right now it is unification.. But in reality, the country is breaking into two..
2007-02-03 06:38:19 · answer #1 · answered by BigWashSr 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's breaking up the country. Yes, Saddam as a dictator was able to hold it way better than Bush's democracy--I'm not arguing whether it was right or not. The US did to to Korea and Vietnam--so what makes the difference in Iraq? It actually makes it easier because they can split it Sunnis and Shia' and not "communists" versus "democrats".
Well Saddam is gone--no weapons of mass destruction--so is Bush waiting for a sign from God to leave Iraq?
2007-02-03 06:43:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
We could pull out now and allow Iran to over-run a weak military and form a new United Islamic Republic making them a major super power. Maybe we were duped into the conflict in the first place but now we have to see it through to prevent them from being able to hold the world hostage with their energy supplies and threat of another Holocaust!
2007-02-11 05:18:17 · answer #3 · answered by bixdix 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It "feels" like that is falling aside yet those "emotions" were felt for over 50 years on your time or yet another. There are solid leaders (Reagan) and undesirable leaders (Carter) and issues lead as a lot because the position they take down (Obama) the commercial gadget or construct it up (Clinton - who also enacted huge tax will boost). the shown reality that banks left out all lending guidelines and lent funds to everybody who ought to fog a reflect ought to get an "F" in any monetary type yet they proceeded on understanding it grow to be going to bust. all the "boost" in housing has busted and ruined tens of millions of lives. in touch by not something. not following sturdy lending, being grasping and wall street woes also did not help. each body envisioned yet another tremendous melancholy and via gosh, the banks helped it. Now with the naive Obama and his radical Pelosi and liberal staggering spending, that is digging a deeper hollow. God help the subsequent President in 2012.
2016-12-03 09:59:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
excellent question but it has no answer. number one --before you go to war --you have to have objectives --what do you want to achieve, obviously there was none -- thus USA and others are stuck with continuing on, without definite objectives. if it is to prevent blood shed -- look at today's' news 120 civil dead...sorry i really feel sorry, and I am not Iraq-i, I think honestly there should be public outcry or where the war is going and what exactly USA wants to achieve. hard case to pinpoint but the brave soldiers need to know that much.
2007-02-03 07:38:28 · answer #5 · answered by s t 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
iraq is breaking nobody can help in that except some ruler like saddam.it,s reality.us has very limited option,s to control it.ultimately u.s. has nothing to do exept withdrawl of forces.
2007-02-09 06:05:48 · answer #6 · answered by ghettu 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your goal in Iraq is that you want to prolong your declining position.
2007-02-10 00:39:43 · answer #7 · answered by Liaquat A 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
come one we are all know it our troops over there because under their land a lot of oil that will satisfy our crazy needs, so is it worth it to send our forces over there....YES for sure because our country will have lots of free oil and will employ mega corporation that provide services for the oil companies which that does not give it a damn how many solider get killed!!!!
2007-02-03 06:54:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
..A greater Persian Empire will come of it.That will form the power base in the mid east .
2007-02-07 15:27:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
breaking apart of this country .Saddam was not dictator. he just refused wrong actions, steel, lazy and so on ...this didn't match with thiefs so they killed him.
2007-02-03 06:52:31 · answer #10 · answered by kater al nada 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋